> On Jan 16, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8037325/webrev.02/
+1
Mandy
On 2017-01-16 22:39, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jan 12, 2017, at 6:48 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
please review this fix to various performance regressions observed
as the security model has evolved over the years.
Bug:
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 6:48 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please review this fix to various performance regressions observed
> as the security model has evolved over the years.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037325
> Webrev:
Hi Joe,
I finally got back to this one and pushed the change with some minor whitespace
diffs.
Thanks
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Wang [mailto:huizhe.w...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Montag, 28. November 2016 20:06
> To: Langer, Christoph
> Cc:
Hi Naoto,
On 14/01/17 00:54, Naoto Sato wrote:
diff -r a6d3c80ea436
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/ResourceBundle.java
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/ResourceBundle.java
+++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/ResourceBundle.java
@@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@
private static
Thank you Paul and Martin for your review.
On 1/13/17 12:52 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
HI Amy,
Overall this looks very good, well done.
At this point we are down to two things:
1) should we preserve exception messages?
2) due diligence on the performance.
On 1) my preference is that uniform