Thanks Lance!
On 12/11/17, 5:49 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
looks OK joe
Best
Lance
On Dec 11, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Joe Wang > wrote:
Hi,
Please review a doc-only fix for 4 dom classes. The material change
is s/broken link/correct link/g,
On 12/11/17 6:31 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Java has an unsigned 16 bit type. Could bci be of type "char" ?
Yes but I think keeping it short is fine.
Mandy
Java has an unsigned 16 bit type. Could bci be of type "char" ?
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:53 PM, mandy chung wrote:
> I filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193325. I can sponsor
> this patch for you.
>
> ---
On Dec 11, 2017, at 6:00 PM, John Rose wrote:
>
> class Arrays {
> // people who want x.toArray can also use x.copy(Arrays::make):
> static T[] make(SequenceContent content) { … }
Correction; that one needs an array type to know what to make:
static T[]
Good.
On Dec 11, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
> Please review this small fix to collapse the two private constructors of
> MethodType into one. This consolidates all the copying/validation logic into
> the factory method makeImpl.
Frankly, I think the JDK is just sloppy here. Most of the existing
implementations didn't use @Override -- possibly because they were
introduced before annotations existed -- and later on, whoever implemented
the overrides of the Java 8 default methods decided to add @Override.
On Dec 7, 2017, at 5:03 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
> (I'm still trying to love this new API)
>
> The changes to the jsr166 tck are fine.
>
> I'm not convinced that the new implementation for ArrayList is progress.
> The current implementation of toArray(T[]) does
>
>
looks OK joe
Best
Lance
> On Dec 11, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Joe Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review a doc-only fix for 4 dom classes. The material change is
> s/broken link/correct link/g, that is replacing all occurrence of the
> non-existent link
On 12/9/17 1:20 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On 8 December 2017 at 00:33, Stuart Marks wrote:
Please review this changeset that introduces a new no-arg method
orElseThrow() to Optional, as a preferred alternative to the get() method.
I am willing to accept this
Thanks Naoto, Alan, David and Venkat. The change is in.
Regards, Peter
Naoto Sato je 11. 12. 2017 ob 19:41 napisal:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the tests. Looks good to me.
One nit: it should throw an Exception instead of AssertionError when
the test fails. No further review is needed.
> Can
It looks okay to me.
Mandy
On 12/11/17 2:02 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Please review this small fix to collapse the two private constructors of
MethodType into one. This consolidates all the copying/validation logic into
the factory method makeImpl.
Thanks,
Paul.
diff -r 77866b9147be
I filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193325. I can
sponsor this patch for you.
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackFrameInfo.java
+++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackFrameInfo.java
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
if (isNativeMethod())
return -1;
Hi,
Please review this small fix to collapse the two private constructors of
MethodType into one. This consolidates all the copying/validation logic into
the factory method makeImpl.
Thanks,
Paul.
diff -r 77866b9147be
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodType.java
---
Hi,
Please review a doc-only fix for 4 dom classes. The material change is
s/broken link/correct link/g, that is replacing all occurrence of the
non-existent link "http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html; with
https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040407/core.html.
Other
Looks good to me.
Naoto
On 12/11/17 1:04 AM, Nishit Jain wrote:
Hi,
Please review the fix for JDK-8190278
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190278
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8190278/webrev.03/
Fix: Modified the code to check whether the object returned by
On Dec 8, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Brian Burkhalter
wrote:
> All previous suggested changes have been made in
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4358774/webrev.03/
>
> except for the possible change of name for the IS and OS nullStream() methods
> which awaits
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180451
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8180451/webrev.00
1. Add overrides of readAllBytes(), readNBytes(), and transferTo().
2. Simplify parameter checks in read(byte[],int,int).
3. Change foo to {@code foo}.
Thanks,
Brian
On 12/11/17, 11:18 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Joe,
The new tests using testng look good, a few comments:
- BAOS/EncodingTest.java
70: The message gets printed if the condition is not true; so
"results do not might" might read better
(also, there is Assert.assertEquals(str1, str2,
+1
On 12/11/2017 1:58 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Please review this simple fix.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk10/JDK-8171826-comparator-equality/webrev/
The method Comparator reverseOrder(Comparator cmp) is updated to be a
little smarter returning constant comparators for natural
Hi Joe,
The new tests using testng look good, a few comments:
- BAOS/EncodingTest.java
70: The message gets printed if the condition is not true; so
"results do not might" might read better
(also, there is Assert.assertEquals(str1, str2, msg) - that
compares objects with .equals())
Hi,
Please review this simple fix.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk10/JDK-8171826-comparator-equality/webrev/
The method Comparator reverseOrder(Comparator cmp) is updated to be a
little smarter returning constant comparators for natural and reverse-natural.
Paul.
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the tests. Looks good to me.
One nit: it should throw an Exception instead of AssertionError when the
test fails. No further review is needed.
> Can this go into JDK 10 ?
You can push it before the JDK 10 fork.
Naoto
On 12/9/17 2:33 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Naoto,
On 07/12/2017 11:20, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
Hi,
... missed some lists in my first post ...
I prepared a fifth webrev for this change. Please review.
It incorporates the changes requested by the CSR reviewers
(not to remove docuemtation of '-help' where is was documented
before) and the
On 11/12/17 9:43 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/12/2017 15:46, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Thanks Alan. Given that the cache itself is being planned to be
eventually removed, that answers the main part of my question and I
can workaround this issue in a couple of ways (disabling the cache
using that
On 11/12/2017 15:26, Srinivas Dama wrote:
Hi,
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdama/8011697/webrev.00/
for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8011697
Fix is to make sure ScriptEngineManager always returns a particular engine on
all platforms consistently.
I assume using a
On 11/12/2017 15:46, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Thanks Alan. Given that the cache itself is being planned to be
eventually removed, that answers the main part of my question and I
can workaround this issue in a couple of ways (disabling the cache
using that system property is one way) in the
Moved this thread from discussions mailing list[1] to here. Comments inline.
On 11/12/17 7:55 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/12/2017 14:06, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
:
So a few related questions that I have are:
1. Is this inconsistency an expected behaviour or is this a bug?
2. If this is
Hi,
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdama/8011697/webrev.00/
for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8011697
Fix is to make sure ScriptEngineManager always returns a particular engine on
all platforms consistently.
Regards,
Srinivas
Hi,
Please review the fix for JDK-8190278
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190278
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8190278/webrev.03/
Fix: Modified the code to check whether the object returned by
NumberFormat#getNumberInstance(Locale) is a DecimalFormat object, if
29 matches
Mail list logo