Mach 5 tier 1 - 3 tests passed on Linux/OS X/Windows x64 and Solaris
sparcv9.
David
On 22/01/2019 2:01 pm, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Patrick,
I'm putting this through our test system (again) and will report back
when its complete.
I also updated the bug report with the patch and assigned to
Hi Patrick,
I'm putting this through our test system (again) and will report back
when its complete.
I also updated the bug report with the patch and assigned to Roger as
the sponsor.
Cheers,
David
On 22/01/2019 12:21 pm, Patrick Zhang wrote:
Thanks Roger.
I did a try to push the patch
Thanks Roger.
I did a try to push the patch within a branch to jdk/submit, and saw
“Permission denied (publickey)”. I sent my SSH pub key to
keys(at)openjdk.java.net but got no response. I heard only committers can have
the access right, could you please help?
Regards
Patrick
From: Roger
Hi Philipp,
This is going to take some further discussion/input as this has been documented
for sometime as a shallow copy.
If there is a consensus to move this forward, it will also require a CSR. I
can help with that and sponsoring the updates, if the decision is to go ahead
with the
Hi Robert,
I've cc'd core-libs-dev as this is now about signed-jars and the launcher.
David
On 22/01/2019 4:48 am, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 1/21/19 8:25 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 1/21/19 5:19 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
-- Moved to hotspot-dev --
Hi Robert,
You can use
> Hi Alan/Brian,
My apologies for having missed this the first time around; messages to lists
get swept into folders, and staying on top of many lists is not an exact
science.
> I believe I have addressed all outstanding comments on the JEP per se,
> including those made by Alan. Is it now
Hi Alan,
On 18/01/2019 13:32, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I had a brief discussion with Brian about this yesterday. He brought up
> the same concern about using MBB as it's not the right API for this in
> the longer term. So this JEP is very much about a short term/tactical
> solution as we've
On 21/01/2019 09:17, Langer, Christoph wrote:
:
OK, I can see the point that in a PosixFileAttributeView as it is, there's no
place for optionality/null values. However, with this approach the benefits
would be that Files::get/setPosixPermissions would work and that's why I think
we should
On 2019-01-18 15:18, Andy Herrick wrote:
Please review the jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open sandbox
repository (jpackage).
The webrev includes all the jpackage Makefile Improvements listed in
[1], other than what is covered by [4],
Hi Goetz,
looks good to me. I think it should rather be "AIX" than "Aix" in the output
text - but it's a developer trace only, so probably nobody cares.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: core-libs-dev On Behalf
> Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Montag, 21. Januar
Hi Joe,
Executing it on Mach5 platforms took around 3s to 5s. Below is the link
https://java.se.oracle.com:10065/mdash/jobs/nishjain-jdk_04_09-20190121-0805-19402/results?search=status%3A*
Also executed using JMH on local linux-64 VM (6GB RAM), it took ~2200 ms
in SingleShotTime mode
Thanks Roger,
Updated.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8210583/webrev.05/
Regards,
Nishit Jain
On 18-01-2019 21:13, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Nishit,
Looks good, with a minor fix.
ok, the rationale for MAX_VALUE-2 make sense.
TestEncodingDecodingLength: Line 61 and 68,
The error message
Hi,
please review the following small test fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr19/8217438-aix_launcherTest/01/
The Aix launcher always sets the path to the jdk libraries because
Aix does not support $ORIGIN to find libjvm.so.
So some of the test cases here fail. Skip them.
Best regards,
Hi Alan,
first of all, thank you for your input on this.
> I think the approach to explore are:
>
> 1. zipfs supports PosixFileAttributeView without subsetting. If
> readAttribute(file, BasicFileAttributes.class) succeeds then
> readAttribute(file, PosixFileAttributes.class) should also
14 matches
Mail list logo
