Hi Ivan,
I was indeed running with JDK 11 instead of JDK 13 (sorry), but like you I
still think it's worthwhile.
>BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236705
>WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8236705/00/webrev/
> If we agree on the content of the fix, I can
On 07/01/2020 07:09, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
So, I filed a Jira bug:
BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236705
WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8236705/00/webrev/
I added these source files in JDK 9, it was just an oversight that I
didn't use the single char replace.
So, I filed a Jira bug:
BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236705
WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8236705/00/webrev/
If we agree on the content of the fix, I can push it after a sanity build.
With kind regards,
Ivan
On 1/6/20 10:41 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hi
On 1/6/20 1:48 PM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
> On 01/06/2020 10:54 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 1/6/20 10:57 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
>>> On 12/24/2019 11:54 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
On 12/24/2019 01:39 AM, Philip Race wrote:
> Have you verified this with VS 2017 ?
> Not that I
Hi Christoph!
First, the same optimization can be done in
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/module/ModulePath.java:
mainClass = mainClass.replace("/", ".");
Second, I wonder what was the JDK version you ran your benchmark on?
After the fix for JDK-8222955 the method
Looks good to me.
-- Jon
On 01/06/2020 04:23 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hi Jon,
Thanks for the comments; second take on the re-wording up at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8234783.1/
and copied below for convenience.
Cheers,
-Joe
---
Hi Alexey,
Can you add description for JpIcon to overrides.wxi, otherwise looks fine.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 12/20/2019 12:16 PM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
Please review fix [2] for jpackage bug [1].
Add properties to msi installers to properly display installation
location and icon of the
Hi Jon,
Thanks for the comments; second take on the re-wording up at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8234783.1/
and copied below for convenience.
Cheers,
-Joe
--- old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Record.java 2020-01-06
16:18:43.505405539 -0800
+++
+1
Paul.
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 3:22 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The initial implementation of java.lang.Record uses a default constructor; an
> explicit constructor should be added instead. Please review the code change
> and CSR for this:
>
> JDK-8236695: java.lang.Record
Hi Adam,
Thanks for the examples. I was hoping for some customer issues and how
they identified the root causes to understand if there is any specific
problem to be considered than improving the overall class loading
diagnosability.
The solution you propose is to add debug/trace statements
Hello,
The initial implementation of java.lang.Record uses a default
constructor; an explicit constructor should be added instead. Please
review the code change and CSR for this:
JDK-8236695: java.lang.Record should be declared with an explicit
constructor
CSR:
Hi Naoto,
The change looks good. Thanks for fixing this. We're seeing it regularly in our
test infrastructure where we're running Mac systems with German locale.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: i18n-dev On Behalf Of
> naoto.s...@oracle.com
> Sent: Montag, 6. Januar
Looks reasonable to me - reviewed.
-Brent
On 1/6/20 10:29 AM, Jim Laskey wrote:
Please review the following CSR intended to clarify the true meaning of
StringBuilder::capacity and StringBuffer::capacity.
csr: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236683
diff --git
I like what you're trying to do, but the wording used to introduce the
names `cr` and `cp` feels a bit contorted. How about using a single
name, c, introduced up front in this line:
+ * of the argument. Equality of a component {@code c} is determined
as follows:
with the rest of the
Hello,
Please review a clarification to the specification of Record.equals:
JDK-8234783: Improve wording of spec of Record.equals
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8234783.0/
Patch below.
Thanks,
-Joe
--- old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Record.java 2020-01-06
On 1/6/20 8:41 pm, Philip Race wrote:
How is this useful given that we disable jtreg failure handlers for the headful
tests ?
It is disabled only in mach5 for headful nightly and CI builds, but it is
enabled for
other builds, also it is enabled if the headful tests are executed standalone
Please review the following CSR intended to clarify the true meaning of
StringBuilder::capacity and StringBuffer::capacity.
csr: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236683
diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java
Thanks, Lance, for the explanation.
I explored your suggestion. Unfortunately, the test invokes a Java
process where each test is performed (LocaleProvidersRun.testRun()
method), and it only checks the exit code of the Java process. So
throwing SkippedException in each test will not be
Hi Naoto
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 12:55 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Hi Lance,
>
> Thank you for the prompt review.
>
> On 1/6/20 9:14 AM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> Hi Naoto,
>> The change looks OK. One thought was whether any thought was given to use
>> SkippedException in the else block
Hi Lance,
Thank you for the prompt review.
On 1/6/20 9:14 AM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Naoto,
The change looks OK. One thought was whether any thought was given to
use SkippedException in the else block starting at line 370 within
LocaleProviders.
I am not familiar with that exception.
That didn't answer all my questions, at least not in a way that I can
understand.
How is this useful given that we disable jtreg failure handlers for the
headful tests ?
-phil.
On 12/30/19, 11:33 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 12/23/19 9:15 pm, Phil Race wrote:
I am not sure what the right
Hi and a happy new year,
I recently noticed that jdk.internal.module.Resources.toPackageName(String)
makes use of String.replace(CharSequence, CharSequence) while it could use the
single char variant in my opinion:
diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/module/Resources.java
Hi Naoto,
The change looks OK. One thought was whether any thought was given to use
SkippedException in the else block starting at line 370 within LocaleProviders.
Best
Lance
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 12:05 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review the fix to the following
Hi,
Please review the fix to the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236495
The proposed changeset is located at:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8236495/webrev.00/
The test case for the fix to 8232860 was only intended for the US
locale. Simply adding the default
On 01/06/2020 10:54 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 1/6/20 10:57 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
On 12/24/2019 11:54 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
On 12/24/2019 01:39 AM, Philip Race wrote:
Have you verified this with VS 2017 ?
Not that I can see a problem but I doubt we want to trade breaking
2017 to
On 1/6/20 10:57 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
> On 12/24/2019 11:54 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
>> On 12/24/2019 01:39 AM, Philip Race wrote:
>>> Have you verified this with VS 2017 ?
>>> Not that I can see a problem but I doubt we want to trade breaking
>>> 2017 to fix 2013 ...
>>
>> Yes, VS 2017
On 12/24/2019 11:54 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
On 12/24/2019 01:39 AM, Philip Race wrote:
Have you verified this with VS 2017 ?
Not that I can see a problem but I doubt we want to trade breaking
2017 to fix 2013 ...
Yes, VS 2017 compiles fine with this fix.
[...]
Bug:
27 matches
Mail list logo