On 2020-02-17 08:48, linzang(臧琳) wrote:
Hi,
May I ask help to review one tiny fix of build failure described at
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239139
Root cause is gcc version 8 prints warning for strncpy.
The fix simply replace strncpy with snprintf.
Thanks!
Maurizio, thanks for pointing the bug out - however I don't think I was
impacted by it.
I agree with you that a more complex examples might distract the audience
from the main presentation points.
As mentioned in one of my previous email, I finalized some examples myself:
1. One example for
Hi,
Thanks for pushing changes!
regards,
Aya Ebata
2020年2月17日(月) 11:37 Yasumasa Suenaga :
> On 2020/02/17 11:21, David Holmes wrote:
> > Hi Yasumasa,
> >
> > On 17/02/2020 11:38 am, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> On 2020/02/17 8:10, David Holmes wrote:
> >>> On 17/02/2020
Hello Lance,
On 15/02/20 2:27 am, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Hi Jaikiran,
>
> I think the changes to ZipFileSystem are OK.
>
> The test overall is good. I am going to streamline it a bit and
> remove the long lines (we try to keep lines to around 80 characters).
>
I'll keep that in mind for future
On 2020/02/17 11:21, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
On 17/02/2020 11:38 am, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
On 2020/02/17 8:10, David Holmes wrote:
On 17/02/2020 12:40 am, Aya Ebata wrote:
Hi,
I sent OCA today. So it hasn't been approved yet. I'm waiting for approval.
For this
Hi Yasumasa,
On 17/02/2020 11:38 am, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
On 2020/02/17 8:10, David Holmes wrote:
On 17/02/2020 12:40 am, Aya Ebata wrote:
Hi,
I sent OCA today. So it hasn't been approved yet. I'm waiting for
approval.
For this trivial contribution an OCA is a not required,
Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/f3f66f9e98ee
Yasumasa
On 2020/02/17 10:38, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
On 2020/02/17 8:10, David Holmes wrote:
On 17/02/2020 12:40 am, Aya Ebata wrote:
Hi,
I sent OCA today. So it hasn't been approved yet. I'm waiting for approval.
Hi David,
On 2020/02/17 8:10, David Holmes wrote:
On 17/02/2020 12:40 am, Aya Ebata wrote:
Hi,
I sent OCA today. So it hasn't been approved yet. I'm waiting for approval.
For this trivial contribution an OCA is a not required, so this can be
sponsored before the OCA goes through
On 17/02/2020 12:40 am, Aya Ebata wrote:
Hi,
I sent OCA today. So it hasn't been approved yet. I'm waiting for approval.
For this trivial contribution an OCA is a not required, so this can be
sponsored before the OCA goes through processing.
Cheers,
David
regards,
Aya Ebata
Hello,
I've complitely reworked the patch according to investigation in [1].
1) usage of JavaLangAccess allows to rid reflection completely and access
package-private String.isLatin1 via SharedSecrets only,
so no black wizardry any more
2) now we have only a few cases with noticeable
Hi,
I sent OCA today. So it hasn't been approved yet. I'm waiting for approval.
regards,
Aya Ebata
2020年2月16日(日) 16:49 Yasumasa Suenaga :
> Hi Aya,
>
> It looks good to me.
> BTW, have you signed to OCA? If so, I will sponsor you.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yasumasa
>
>
> On 2020/02/16 16:42, 江畑 彩
Hi Rafael,
Thanks for reaching out and reminding me of this!
I managed to find some time to look into 8202469 during the weekend. By
swapping place of the TVars in the test I managed to isolate this without
depending on 8202473, take a look at my hacky copy-paste update to your
test at
12 matches
Mail list logo
