On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:49:09 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review this simple doc fix.
Marked as reviewed by joehw (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/234
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:17:58 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> Ok, sorry for the distraction.
>
> Our local Santuario maintainer says:
>
> In general, changes to Apache Santuario should also be made at Apache so we
> stay in sync.
Hi @doom369, I hope we didn't end up wasting too much of your tim
Hi,
Please review this simple doc fix.
-
Commit messages:
- 8253153: Mentioning of "hour-of-minute" in java.time.temporal.TemporalField
JavaDoc
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/234/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=234&range=00
Issue: htt
Hello,
is it possible to have a code review for the changes proposed in JDK-8251548
(originally contributed via
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2020-June/022137.html)?
Sean Mullan has created an issue and web-review and can sponsor the patch as
soos as it gets properly revi
> Related to [JDK-8252730 jlink does not create reproducible builds on different
> servers](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252730). Introduces
> ordering based on `Archive` module names to
> ensure stable files (and file signatures) across generated JDK images by
> jlink.
Ian Graves h
> Related to [JDK-8252730 jlink does not create reproducible builds on different
> servers](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252730). Introduces
> ordering based on `Archive` module names to
> ensure stable files (and file signatures) across generated JDK images by
> jlink.
Ian Graves h
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:04:01 GMT, Jason Tatton
wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the indexOf(char) intrinsic for StringLatin1 (1
>> byte encoded Strings). It is provided for
>> x86 and ARM64. The implementation is greatly inspired by the indexOf(char)
>> intrinsic for StringUTF16. To inco
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 18:30:08 GMT, Andy Herrick wrote:
> JDK-8230652
> Extracting the commands displayed by verbose output (including commands
> called thru ToolProvider) , to contain the the
> command, it's output, and it's return value on separate lines and formatted
> in a way that they can b
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 05:18:28 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> Contributed-by: ard.biesheu...@linaro.org, dong...@huawei.com
>>
>> This added an intrinsic for SHA3 using aarch64 v8.2 SHA3 Crypto Extensions.
>> Reference implementation for core SHA-3 transform using ARMv8.2 Crypto
>> Extensions:
>> https:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:30:40 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Leonard
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 24765e45
Author:Andrew Leonard
Committer: Roger Riggs
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/24765e45
Stats: 3 lines in 2 files ch
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:30:40 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Leonard
Marked as reviewed by jlaskey (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/223
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:09:09 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Leonard
>
> Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
@RogerRiggs thanks Roger, please can you Sponsor this PR ? thanks
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/223
> You don't need to ask for RFRs yourself. Bots do that for you, and post
on your behalf
Yeah, I saw that just after I posted mine, that's cool :-)
Andrew Leonard
Java Runtimes Development
IBM Hursley
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
internet email: andrew_m_leon...@uk.ibm.com
From: Aleksey Shipilev
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:35:06 GMT, Galder Zamarreño
wrote:
> * Release fence guarantees that cacheArray field will published with a
> non-null value.
> * Without this fix, CacheValueMap.cacheArray can sometimes be seen as null.
>
> This is a follow up to @PaulSandoz's feedback
> [here](https://m
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:30:40 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Leonard
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/223
On 9/17/20 2:57 PM, Andrew Leonard wrote:
Hi,
Please can I request a review of this test fix to explicitly specify
-XX:+CompactStrings which is required for the tests in question,
specifically for VMs (openj9) that do not default to +CompactStrings, see:
PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull
Hi,
Please can I request a review of this test fix to explicitly specify
-XX:+CompactStrings which is required for the tests in question,
specifically for VMs (openj9) that do not default to +CompactStrings, see:
PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/223
bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/br
Signed-off-by: Andrew Leonard
-
Commit messages:
- 8253285: Some java/util/StringJoiner tests do not explicitly specify
required -XX:+CompactStrings
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/223/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=223&range=00
Issue
On 17/09/2020 7:24 pm, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
Hi David,
thanks for pointing this out!
I've created a PR there [1], but GitHub for some reason wants me to sign OCA,
which I have already signed in 2017. I've redone the procedure and now I'm
waiting
for verification.
Did you not follow these ins
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 08:52:35 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> The CSR lists `com.sun.java.accessibility.util.SwingEventMonitor` as being
> changed, but I cannot find that class in
> this PR.
Changes to this class were indeed missing. This has now been addressed. Thanks
for spotting that!
-
> This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors
> in the java.desktop module'. The
> following classes have had an explicit no-arg constructor added, with a
> protected access modifier and accompanying API
> description:
> - Default ctor on com.sun.java.accessibil
Hi David,
thanks for pointing this out!
I've created a PR there [1], but GitHub for some reason wants me to sign OCA,
which I have already signed in 2017. I've redone the procedure and now I'm
waiting
for verification.
Regards,
Sergey
1. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/218
17.09.2020, 09:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:25:05 GMT, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
>> Updated PR.
>
> @galderz did you really update the PR? I still see the _storeFence_ before
> the write.
ah, sorry I got it now. Please ignore my previous comment.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/94
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:49:08 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
> This patch assures that an annotation on a type bound is placed on the
> correct bound index.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 53a4ef26
Author:Rafael Winterhalter
Committer: Joel Borggrén-Franck
URL:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:48:23 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>
> It allows for JIT optimizations based on escape an
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:44:09 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>>
>> It allows for JIT optimizations based on es
Hi Sergey,
Since OpenJDK has moved to git/github, this needs to reformulated as a
Pull Request (PR).
Cheers,
David
On 17/09/2020 5:19 pm, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to have a code review for the changes proposed in JDK-8251548?
Sean Mullan has created an issue and web-revi
Hello,
is it possible to have a code review for the changes proposed in JDK-8251548?
Sean Mullan has created an issue and web-review and can sponsor the patch
as soos as it gets properly reviewed.
As Doug Lea claims in
http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-December/014770.htm
28 matches
Mail list logo
