> Hi,
>
> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>
> It allows for JIT optimizations based on escape analysis even if JVMTI agents
> acquire capabilities to access
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 23:31:51 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
> Please review the fix for
> [JDK-8253455](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8253455) which is part
> of the effort
> to make records a final feature of the Java Language. The rest of the code
> has been published in
>
If an annotation member type is changed in an incompatible manner, the
`AnnotationParser` currently throws a
`NullPointerException` if:
- An enumeration-typed member is changed to be an annotation type or a `Class`
type.
- An annotation type is changed to be a non-annotation type.
This patch
Hi Jorn,
I'm not reviewing this but this exchange caught my attention ...
On 16/10/2020 9:15 pm, Jorn Vernee wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:42:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
Maurizio Cimadamore has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
On 17/10/2020 1:23 am, Kim Barrett wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:41:17 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
Kim Barrett has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incremental webrev
excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:30:51 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
> 8246774: implement Record Classes as a standard feature in Java
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: c17d5851
Author:Vicente Romero
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/c17d5851
Stats: 856 lines
> 8246774: implement Record Classes as a standard feature in Java
Vicente Romero has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
removing reference to unused jcod file from test
-
Changes:
- all:
> 8246774: implement Record Classes as a standard feature in Java
Vicente Romero has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now
contains 10 commits:
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8246774
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8246774
-
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:13:08 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Hi Mandy,
>>
>> I read your concerns and have an alternative API proposition here. Instread
>> of an abstract class with protected final
>> `invokeDefaultMethod` method, we can keep the public static
>> `invokeDefaultMethod` and add a
> Hi,
>
> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>
> It allows for JIT optimizations based on escape analysis even if JVMTI agents
> acquire capabilities to access
10 matches
Mail list logo