On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:01:10 GMT, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>> 8261483: jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java failed with
>> "AssertionError: Should have GCd a method handle by now"
>
> Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
> commits have been
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:10:15 GMT, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>> test/jdk/jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java line 79:
>>
>>> 77:
>>> 78: public static void main(String[] args) {
>>> 79: for (int count = 0; count < MAX_ITERATIONS; ++count) {
>>
>> Here and later: use
Hello Alan,
On 27/02/21 2:23 pm, Alan Bateman wrote:
Yes, the option name will need to be agreed. It would be useful to
enumerate the options that the other tools are using to specify the
location where to extract. If you see JBS issues mentioning tar -C not
supporting chdir when extracting
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:03:26 GMT, Peter Levart wrote:
>> The good test would be trying with all current GCs (Serial, Parallel, G1,
>> Shenandoah, ZGC):
>>
>> make run-test TEST=jdk/dynalink TEST_VM_OPTS=-XX:+UseSerialGC
>>
>> Also, make sure that GH actions are able to run this test. You
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:34:10 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
>
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:34:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
>
> 8261483: jdk/dynalink/TypeConverterFactoryMemoryLeakTest.java failed with
> "AssertionError: Should have GCd a method handle by now"
Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared
to
HI Jaikiran,
I am more than happy to work with you through the CSR process
Lets get the discussion going regarding possible option names on core-libs-dev
and then we can move forward :-)
Have a great weekend
On Feb 26, 2021, at 9:03 PM, Jaikiran Pai
mailto:jai.forums2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Vector API fails to work when:
> - case 1: MaxVectorSize is set to <=8, or
> - case 2: C2 is disabled
>
> The reason is that {max/preferred} VectorShape initialization fails in both
> cases.
> And the root cause is that VectorSupport_GetMaxLaneCount [1] returns
> unreasonable
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:58:16 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> Jie Fu has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
>> a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
>> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits
>>
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 03:23:12 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Vector API fails to work when:
>> - case 1: MaxVectorSize is set to <=8, or
>> - case 2: C2 is disabled
>>
>> The reason is that {max/preferred} VectorShape initialization fails in both
>> cases.
>> And the root cause is that
On 26/02/2021 19:47, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Jaikiran,
Thank you for the proposed patch.
Assuming there is consensus to add support for this enhancement, I think we
need to discuss what is the correct option.
The jar tool borrows -C from tar for creating/updating a jar and the -C option
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:50:19 GMT, Christoph Göttschkes wrote:
> Please review this small patch which fixes the coding style of
> CharacterDataPrivateUse.java
Looks fine. This source file was a .template until a few weeks ago, probably
should have fixed the indentation issues when moving it to
13 matches
Mail list logo
