Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v4]

2021-03-19 Thread Thomas Stuefe
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:41:51 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Intermittent failures on Windows in a test of destroying the child warrant >> extending the time the parent waits after starting the child before >> destroying the child. > > Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one

Integrated: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org

2021-03-19 Thread Naoto Sato
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:57:31 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > Fixed several broken links to Unicode.org. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 96e5c3f1 Author:Naoto Sato URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/96e5c3f1 Stats: 37 lines in 8 files changed: 4 ins; 0

Re: RFR: 4926314: Optimize Reader.read(CharBuffer) [v9]

2021-03-19 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:57:01 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Philippe Marschall has updated the pull request with a new target base due >> to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits: >> >> - Merge master >> - Fix bug in CharArrayReader and add unit test >> - Clean up unit

Re: RFR: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Joe Wang
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:23:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> Fixed several broken links to Unicode.org. > > Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Addressed review comments. Looks all good. Thanks Naoto. -

Re: RFR: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Naoto Sato
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:43:30 GMT, Joe Wang wrote: > Some minor comments. Thanks, Joe. Addressed them as suggested. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3093

Re: RFR: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Naoto Sato
> Fixed several broken links to Unicode.org. Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Addressed review comments. - Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3093/files - new:

Integrated: 8263892: More modifier order fixes in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:23:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Additional changes found in `java.base` of `final private` -> `private > final`. Filed with existing bug because it's the same module; can change to a > different bug number if required. This pull request has now been integrated.

Re: RFR: 8263892: More modifier order fixes in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:23:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Additional changes found in `java.base` of `final private` -> `private > final`. Filed with existing bug because it's the same module; can change to a > different bug number if required. Marked as reviewed by redestad (Reviewer).

Integrated: 8263885: Use the blessed modifier order in java.sql/rowset/transation.xa

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:27:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Fixes for the `java.sql`, `java.sql.rowset` and `java.transaction.xa` > packages. > > @cl4es would you mind creating a subtask of JDK-8263854 so I can update the > PR title? This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset:

Re: RFR: 8263892: More modifier order fixes in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:23:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Additional changes found in `java.base` of `final private` -> `private > final`. Filed with existing bug because it's the same module; can change to a > different bug number if required. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

Integrated: JDK-8263545: Convert jpackage to use Stream.toList()

2021-03-19 Thread Ian Graves
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:22:50 GMT, Ian Graves wrote: > This converts jpackage to use `Stream.toList()` instead of > `Stream.collect(Collectors.toList())`. One piece of code was modified to not > mutate a list in addition to one test that used a mutating sort on a list. > The rest of the

Re: RFR: 8263885: Use the blessed modifier order in java.sql/rowset/transation.xa

2021-03-19 Thread Lance Andersen
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:27:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Fixes for the `java.sql`, `java.sql.rowset` and `java.transaction.xa` > packages. > > @cl4es would you mind creating a subtask of JDK-8263854 so I can update the > PR title? Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer). - PR:

Re: RFR: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org

2021-03-19 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:57:31 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > Fixed several broken links to Unicode.org. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3093

Re: RFR: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org

2021-03-19 Thread Joe Wang
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:57:31 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > Fixed several broken links to Unicode.org. Some minor comments. src/java.base/share/classes/java/text/Collator.java line 211: > 209: * FULL_DECOMPOSITION corresponds to Normalization Form KD as > 210: * described in > 211: *

Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v4]

2021-03-19 Thread Roger Riggs
> Intermittent failures on Windows in a test of destroying the child warrant > extending the time the parent waits after starting the child before > destroying the child. Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Clarify

Re: RFR: 8263658: Use the blessed modifier order in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:31:02 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> Additional changes found in `java.base` of `final private` -> `private >> final`. Filed with existing bug because it's the same module; can change to >> a different bug number if required. > > Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer). Can't

Re: RFR: 8263658: Use the blessed modifier order in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Naoto Sato
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:23:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Additional changes found in `java.base` of `final private` -> `private > final`. Filed with existing bug because it's the same module; can change to a > different bug number if required. Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer).

RFR: 8263658: Use the blessed modifier order in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
Additional changes found in `java.base` of `final private` -> `private final`. Filed with existing bug because it's the same module; can change to a different bug number if required. - Commit messages: - 8263658: Use the blessed modifier order in java.base Changes:

Re: RFR: 8263885: Use the blessed modifier order in java.sql/rowset/transation.xa

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:27:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Fixes for the `java.sql`, `java.sql.rowset` and `java.transaction.xa` > packages. > > @cl4es would you mind creating a subtask of JDK-8263854 so I can update the > PR title? Marked as reviewed by redestad (Reviewer). -

RFR: 8263885: Use the blessed modifier order in java.sql/rowset/transation.xa

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
Fixes for the `java.sql`, `java.sql.rowset` and `java.transaction.xa` packages. @cl4es would you mind creating a subtask of JDK-8263854 so I can update the PR title? - Commit messages: - Use the blessed modifier order in java.sql/rowset/transation.xa Changes:

Re: RFR: 8263885: Use the blessed modifier order in java.sql/rowset/transation.xa

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:27:00 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Fixes for the `java.sql`, `java.sql.rowset` and `java.transaction.xa` > packages. > > @cl4es would you mind creating a subtask of JDK-8263854 so I can update the > PR title? 8263885 - PR:

Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v3]

2021-03-19 Thread Ioi Lam
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:17:02 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Intermittent failures on Windows in a test of destroying the child warrant >> extending the time the parent waits after starting the child before >> destroying the child. > > Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one

Re: RFR: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:57:31 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > Fixed several broken links to Unicode.org. Marked as reviewed by redestad (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3093

RFR: 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org

2021-03-19 Thread Naoto Sato
Fixed several broken links to Unicode.org. - Commit messages: - 8263890: Broken links to Unicode.org Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3093/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=3093=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263890

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:13:58 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: >> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the >> `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules. > > Alex Blewitt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit

Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Thomas Stuefe
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:01:26 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java line 2156: >> >>> 2154: case 1: >>> 2155: childArgs.set(1, >>> "-XX:+DisplayVMOutputToStdout"); >>> 2156:

Re: RFR: JDK-8263545: Convert jpackage to use Stream.toList() [v3]

2021-03-19 Thread Ian Graves
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:17:34 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote: >> Ian Graves has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits: >> >> - Clarifying type argument and shorting a toArray invocation >> - Converting jpackage to

Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v3]

2021-03-19 Thread Roger Riggs
> Intermittent failures on Windows in a test of destroying the child warrant > extending the time the parent waits after starting the child before > destroying the child. Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Correct

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the > `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules. Alex Blewitt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Added more replacements of 'final

Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Roger Riggs
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:54:43 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote: >> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Redirect VM output away from stream under test > > test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java line 2156: > >> 2154:

Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Thomas Stuefe
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 14:23:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Intermittent failures on Windows in a test of destroying the child warrant >> extending the time the parent waits after starting the child before >> destroying the child. > > Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one

Re: RFR: 8263763: Synthetic constructor parameters of enum are not considered for annotation indices [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Rafael Winterhalter
> 8263763: The constructor of an enumeration prefixes with two synthetic > arguments for constant name and ordinal index. For this reason, the > constructor annotations need to be shifted two indices to the right, such > that the annotation indices match with the parameter indices. Rafael

Re: RFR: 8263763: Synthetic constructor parameters of enum are not considered for annotation indices

2021-03-19 Thread Rafael Winterhalter
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 05:24:24 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> 8263763: The constructor of an enumeration prefixes with two synthetic >> arguments for constant name and ordinal index. For this reason, the >> constructor annotations need to be shifted two indices to the right, such >> that the

Re: RFR: 8263729: [test] Extend time to wait before destroying child in ProcssBuilder Basic test [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Roger Riggs
> Intermittent failures on Windows in a test of destroying the child warrant > extending the time the parent waits after starting the child before > destroying the child. Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Redirect VM

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:26:20 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the > `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules. Overall good - found a few cases where the private modifier is in the wrong place that

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:28:12 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: >> Thanks @cl4es -- do I need to update the git commit message as well, or is >> updating the title of the PR sufficient? I recall you suggesting not to do >> amend/rebases previously. > > No, the git commit messages here doesn't matter,

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:08:24 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: >> Created the subtask https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263855 for >> this along with an umbrella RFE. > > Thanks @cl4es -- do I need to update the git commit message as well, or is > updating the title of the PR sufficient? I

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:20:39 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: >> Would someone mind creating a bug for me? In addition, if it would help, we >> could create a parent bug for applying cleanups and associate #2993 and >> #2991. > > @cl4es would you mind creating a parent task of something like "Source

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:01:45 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: >> @cl4es would you mind creating a parent task of something like "Source code >> cleanups" and then another sub task for this change please? > > Created the subtask https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263855 for this > along with

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:33:59 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: >> As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the >> `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules. > > Would someone mind creating a bug for me? In addition, if it would help, we > could

Re: RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:26:20 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the > `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules. Would someone mind creating a bug for me? In addition, if it would help, we could create

RFR: 8263855: Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
As with #2993 changing the order of `final static` to `static final` for the `java.management`, `java.management.rmi` and `java.naming` modules. - Commit messages: - Use the blessed modifier order in java.management/naming Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3078/files

Integrated: 8263658: Use the blessed modifier order in java.base

2021-03-19 Thread Alex Blewitt
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:45:30 GMT, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Sonar displays a warning message that modifiers should be declared in the > order listed in the JLS; specifically, that isntead of using `final static` > the `static final` should be preferred. > > This fixes the issues in the

Integrated: 8263821: Remove unused MethodTypeForm canonicalization codes

2021-03-19 Thread Claes Redestad
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:42:49 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote: > MethodTypeForm.INTS, LONGS and RAW_RETURN are effectively unused. This > removes these canonicalization codes and cleans up related code. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 57497ab0 Author:Claes Redestad URL:

Re: RFR: 4890732: GZIPOutputStream doesn't support, in fact thwarts, use of optional GZIP fields [v3]

2021-03-19 Thread Lin Zang
> 4890732: GZIPOutputStream doesn't support, in fact thwarts, use of optional > GZIP fields Lin Zang has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision: - update copyright - reuse arguments constructor for non-argument one. - Changes:

Re: RFR: 4890732: GZIPOutputStream doesn't support, in fact thwarts, use of optional GZIP fields [v2]

2021-03-19 Thread Lin Zang
> 4890732: GZIPOutputStream doesn't support, in fact thwarts, use of optional > GZIP fields Lin Zang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: add test case - Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3072/files

Re: RFR: 4890732: GZIPOutputStream doesn't support, in fact thwarts, use of optional GZIP fields

2021-03-19 Thread Lin Zang
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:50:05 GMT, Lin Zang wrote: >> 4890732: GZIPOutputStream doesn't support, in fact thwarts, use of optional >> GZIP fields > > Dear All, > This PR introduce new constructor of GZIPOutputStream to support adding extra > field info in gzip file header, as decribed in RFC