On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:15:57 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> Firstly, I wonder how important this is for most applications. I don't
>> actually know, but let's put that to one side.
>>
>> There's a lot of unrolling, particularly in the non-SIMD case. Please
>> consider taking out some of the
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:15:57 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> Firstly, I wonder how important this is for most applications. I don't
>> actually know, but let's put that to one side.
>>
>> There's a lot of unrolling, particularly in the non-SIMD case. Please
>> consider taking out some of the
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:53:37 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> There's a lot of unrolling, particularly in the non-SIMD case. Please
> consider taking out some of the unrolling; I suspect it'd not increase time
> by very much but would greatly reduce the code cache pollution. It's very
> tempting
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:54:57 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> In JDK-8248188, IntrinsicCandidate and API is added for Base64 decoding.
>> Base64 decoding can be improved on aarch64 with ld4/tbl/tbx/st3, a basic
>> idea can be found at
>>
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:58:03 GMT, Dong Bo wrote:
> In JDK-8248188, IntrinsicCandidate and API is added for Base64 decoding.
> Base64 decoding can be improved on aarch64 with ld4/tbl/tbx/st3, a basic idea
> can be found at
> http://0x80.pl/articles/base64-simd-neon.html#encoding-quadwords.
>
>
On Mar 27, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Alan Bateman
mailto:al...@openjdk.java.net>> wrote:
Dear Lanceļ¼
Sorry that I reply so late, I got stuck at some work recently.
* We should have tests that include some , but not all of the additional fields
as I believe they are all optional according to the
On Mar 28, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Jaikiran Pai
mailto:jai.forums2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Lance ran some tests against the proposed patch and that has exposed an area
which we haven't yet taken into account for this feature.
The jar tool has a (hidden) option "-P" which can be used with the "c"
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:53:27 GMT, Alex Blewitt
wrote:
> 8264334: Use the blessed modifier order in jdk.jpackage
Marked as reviewed by herrick (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3234
8264334: Use the blessed modifier order in jdk.jpackage
-
Commit messages:
- 8264334: Use the blessed modifier order in jdk.jpackage
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3234/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=3234=00
Issue:
> I noticed that `javax.script.ScriptEngineManager` `getEngineByXxx` methods
> had a lot of code duplication among themselves, and even within each method.
> I refactored them into a modern unified implementation. While there I also
> took the opportunity to introduce `Objects.requireNonNull`
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:46:36 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Attila Szegedi has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains 13 new
>>
Lance ran some tests against the proposed patch and that has exposed an
area which we haven't yet taken into account for this feature.
The jar tool has a (hidden) option "-P" which can be used with the "c"
(create), "u" (update) and "x" (extract) main operations. When this -P
option is used,
12 matches
Mail list logo
