Still looking for reviewers
Thanks
- Ioi
On 12/1/21 1:02 PM, Ioi Lam wrote:
**Background:**
In the Java Language, Enums can be tested for equality, so the constants in an
Enum type must be unique. Javac compiles an enum declaration like this:
public enum Day { SUNDAY, MONDAY ... }
t
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 21:18:12 GMT, Victor Dyakov wrote:
> it requires @alexeysemenyukoracle review (owner of JDK-8274856 changeset)
Well, this looks trivial to me. Should we really wait @alexeysemenyukoracle,
who, I assume, might be on NY holiday break?
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.jav
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:11:47 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Patch extends existing macrologic inferencing algorithm to handle masked
>> logic operations.
>>
>> Existing algorithm:
>>
>> 1. Identify logic cone roots.
>> 2. Packs parent and logic child nodes into a MacroLogic node in bottom up
>>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 16:46:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> The real problem is Y2038
> ([JDK-8279444](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8279444)), which does
> not look solvable at this time. So for test cleanliness, we might just
> disable this test on 32-bit platforms.
>
> Additional
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:11:47 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Patch extends existing macrologic inferencing algorithm to handle masked
>> logic operations.
>>
>> Existing algorithm:
>>
>> 1. Identify logic cone roots.
>> 2. Packs parent and logic child nodes into a MacroLogic node in bottom up
>>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:11:47 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Patch extends existing macrologic inferencing algorithm to handle masked
>> logic operations.
>>
>> Existing algorithm:
>>
>> 1. Identify logic cone roots.
>> 2. Packs parent and logic child nodes into a MacroLogic node in bottom up
>>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:01:22 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86.ad line 1900:
>>
>>> 1898:
>>> 1899: case Op_MacroLogicV:
>>> 1900: if(bt != T_INT && bt != T_LONG) {
>>
>> Missing `VM_Version::supports_evex()` check?
>
> Hi @vnkozlov, we already have that check (UseA
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 16:46:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> The real problem is Y2038
> ([JDK-8279444](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8279444)), which does
> not look solvable at this time. So for test cleanliness, we might just
> disable this test on 32-bit platforms.
>
> Additional
The real problem is Y2038
([JDK-8279444](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8279444)), which does
not look solvable at this time. So for test cleanliness, we might just disable
this test on 32-bit platforms.
Additional testing:
- [x] Linux x86_64 fastdebug, affected test still passes
-
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:39:08 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR fixes an issue with alignment constraints not being enforced
>> correctly on on-heap segments dereference/copy operations. Alignment of
>> on-heap segments cannot be computed exactly, as alignment of elements in
>> arrays
> Patch extends existing macrologic inferencing algorithm to handle masked
> logic operations.
>
> Existing algorithm:
>
> 1. Identify logic cone roots.
> 2. Packs parent and logic child nodes into a MacroLogic node in bottom up
> traversal if input constraint are met.
> i.e. maximum number of
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 02:21:35 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Jatin Bhateja has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional
>> commi
> This PR fixes an issue with alignment constraints not being enforced
> correctly on on-heap segments dereference/copy operations. Alignment of
> on-heap segments cannot be computed exactly, as alignment of elements in
> arrays is, ultimately a VM implementation detail. Because of this, alignme
13 matches
Mail list logo
