Re: OpenJDK Forum: Core Libraries Round Table

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/4/9 Mark Thornton mthorn...@optrak.co.uk: Jeff Dinkins wrote: VLC plays ogg. What? You don't have VLC? Well time to grab a copy!  http://www.videolan.org/vlc jeff p.s. I vote to keep it ogg only to promote more people to use it :-) Shouldn't you be using a format supported by

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Get rid of synchronization in java.util.logging.LogRecord constructor

2009-03-12 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/3/13 Dalibor Topic dalibor.to...@sun.com: David M. Lloyd wrote: On 03/12/2009 05:41 PM, Mark Reinhold wrote: You might want to have a look at the new contribution process [1]. Using that will increase the probability that someone will evaluate your patch sooner rather than later. -

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Get rid of synchronization in java.util.logging.LogRecord constructor

2009-03-12 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/3/12 Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com: This looks fine, as long as there is no dependency of the implementation on the two atomic counters being incremented in concert, as seems likely. Martin On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 15:35, David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.com wrote: Switch to

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Get rid of synchronization in java.util.logging.LogRecord constructor

2009-03-12 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/3/13 David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.com: On 03/12/2009 07:01 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: David M. Lloyd wrote: On 03/12/2009 05:41 PM, Mark Reinhold wrote: You might want to have a look at the new contribution process [1]. Using that will increase the probability that someone will

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Get rid of synchronization in java.util.logging.LogRecord constructor

2009-03-12 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/3/13 David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.com: On 03/12/2009 07:13 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote: This is actually an interesting rare case where two atomic variables can replace a synchronised block.  Looking at the code, there seems to be no issue with the thread being descheduled

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Get rid of synchronization in java.util.logging.LogRecord constructor

2009-03-12 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/3/13 Dalibor Topic dalibor.to...@sun.com: David M. Lloyd wrote: It seems that the change would break serialization, by changing the type of a serialized field (in both classes) away from a primitive one. See http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/platform/serialization/spec/version.html for

Re: Is com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGCodec Included in OpenJDK?

2008-10-09 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2008/10/9 Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Hope this is the right list (If not please let me know). Anyone know if com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGCodec is included in OpenJDK? Thanks, - Ole It's been removed from 1.7 AFAIK. You should now be using the javax.imageio API introduced in 1.4.

Re: Is third party code included in langtools sources?

2008-08-15 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 05/08/2008, Yulia Novozhilova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Could you please, help me to answer a question: Is third party code included in langtools sources? If no then _why_ the THIRD_PARTY_README and ASSEMBLY_EXCEPTION files are included into the repository? Actually I'm working

<    1   2