> Please consider this request to add an override
> `java.io.FileInputStream.transferTo(OutputStream)` with improved performance
> if the parameter is a `FileOutputStream`.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:07:53 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Please consider this request to add an override
>> `java.io.FileInputStream.transferTo(OutputStream)` with improved performance
>> if the parameter is a `FileOutputStream`.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:07:53 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Please consider this request to add an override
>> `java.io.FileInputStream.transferTo(OutputStream)` with improved performance
>> if the parameter is a `FileOutputStream`.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has
> Please consider this request to add an override
> `java.io.FileInputStream.transferTo(OutputStream)` with improved performance
> if the parameter is a `FileOutputStream`.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:24:39 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please review the fix for JDK-8263940 to address an issues when the default
>> file system provider is packaged as JAR file on class path.
>>
>> The patch also addresses the `@bug` line for JDK-8271194
>>
>> Mach5 Tier1
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 11:30:16 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Please consider this request to add an override
>> `java.io.FileInputStream.transferTo(OutputStream)` with improved performance
>> if the parameter is a `FileOutputStream`.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/FileInputStream.java line
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:27:53 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> I think I fixed all requested changes. Anymore comments on this PR?
>>
>> I hope to get to this soon.
>
>> I think I fixed all requested changes. Anymore comments on this PR?
>
> I've looked through the latest revision. Is there any way
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 01:16:04 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this request to add an override
> `java.io.FileInputStream.transferTo(OutputStream)` with improved performance
> if the parameter is a `FileOutputStream`.
Invoking `transferTo()` on a `FileInputStream` wil
Please consider this request to add an override
`java.io.FileInputStream.transferTo(OutputStream)` with improved performance if
the parameter is a `FileOutputStream`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8272297: FileInputStream should override transferTo() for better performance
Changes: https:/
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 22:01:33 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
>> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a
>> possible solution for issue
>> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not
>> yet* intended for a final review.
>>
>> As proposed i
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 18:57:42 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Add methods `floorDivExact(int,int)` and `floorDivExact(long,long)` to
>> `java.lang.Math` and `java.lang.StrictMath`.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge
> Add methods `floorDivExact(int,int)` and `floorDivExact(long,long)` to
> `java.lang.Math` and `java.lang.StrictMath`.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains five commits:
- 8271225: Verbiage update
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:42:08 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Remove extraneous tag to fix build breakage.
Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5002
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:44:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
>> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>>
>> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
>>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:44:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
>> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>>
>> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
>>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:37:12 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
>> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>>
>> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
>>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:05:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> `oddPart` contains a lot of info on the `modInverse` output, sometimes it's
> even the same. Clearing it in case the result is sensitive.
>
> No new regression test since it's difficult to access a temporary local
> variable in an internal
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:42:18 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> The `floorDivExact()` methods are identical to their `floorDiv()`
>> counterparts aside from that they throw an `ArithmeticException` when the
>> dividend is `MIN_VALUE` and the divisor is `-1`. These methods behave with
>> respec
> Add methods `floorDivExact(int,int)` and `floorDivExact(long,long)` to
> `java.lang.Math` and `java.lang.StrictMath`.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8271225: Some verbiage updates
-
C
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 19:59:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please review this tiny change in the implementation of
> j.l.Math.floorMod(int, int).
>
> While the results are unaffected, all of
> floorDiv(int, int)
> floorDiv(long, long)
> floorMod(long, long)
> use x ^
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:56:40 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
>> It's actually a matter of convention but I think it can remain as it is.
>
> Ok for me, otherwise just clearly tell me and I do change it.
I think you can leave it unless someone else thinks otherwise.
-
PR: https://git.openj
Add methods `floorDivExact(int,int)` and `floorDivExact(long,long)` to
`java.lang.Math` and `java.lang.StrictMath`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8271225: Add floorDivExact() method to java.lang.[Strict]Math
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4941/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:27:32 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Add methods `floorDivExact(int,int)` and `floorDivExact(long,long)` to
> `java.lang.Math` and `java.lang.StrictMath`.
The `floorDivExact()` methods are identical to their `floorDiv()` counterparts
aside from that they th
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:05:58 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Improve the clarity of comments in the ObjectInputFilter FilterInThread
> example.
Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/293
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:12:23 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/nio/ch/ChannelInputStream.java line 179:
>>
>>> 177: for (long n = srcSize - srcPos; bytesWritten < n;)
>>> 178: bytesWritten += src.transferTo(srcPos + bytesWritten,
>>> Long.MA
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:45:14 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
>> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a
>> possible solution for issue
>> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not
>> yet* intended for a final review.
>>
>> As proposed
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:45:14 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
>> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a
>> possible solution for issue
>> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not
>> yet* intended for a final review.
>>
>> As proposed
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:45:14 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
>> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a
>> possible solution for issue
>> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not
>> yet* intended for a final review.
>>
>> As proposed
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:21:52 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
This pull request has
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:27:27 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review this PR to introduce `java.time.Duration.isPositive()` method.
> A CSR is also drafted.
Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4892
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:46:09 GMT, Ian Graves wrote:
>> 8199594: Add doc describing how (?x) ignores spaces in character classes
>
> Ian Graves has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Rewording repetitive phrase
Marked as reviewed b
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
co
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:39:13 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to add some test coverage comparing `Math` and
> `StrictMath` results of `pow()`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1362e094
Author: Brian Burkhalter
URL:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:18:42 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Given changes in JLS 9.6.4.1, JDK-8261610 in Java SE 17, the statements about
> annotation applicability made in java.lang.annotation.Target need to be
> updated to match.
>
> Please also review the corresponding CSR:
> https://bugs.openjdk
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 16:43:48 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Please consider this proposal to add some test coverage comparing `Math` and
>> `StrictMath` results of `pow()`.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit si
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
co
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commit
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
co
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:07:42 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Removing unnecessary `@SuppressWarnings("exports")`. The reason for the
> suppress warnings was, as far as I can tell, removed by
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265137.
+1
-
Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 16:45:20 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Are there examples in the JDK or its tests where a method with this
> definition would be used?
I have not identified any as yet. I did verify however that there are no uses
in `open/src/**/*.java` of either `absExact()` or `negateExact()`,
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 16:43:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8075806: Separate div-by-0 verbiage; change impl
>
> src/java.base/share/classes
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
co
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:21:52 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
@rgiulietti Actually your t
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:21:52 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
Thanks. I was thinkin
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:20:29 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
>> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a
>> possible solution for issue
>> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not
>> yet* intended for a final review.
>>
>> As proposed i
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:29:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8211002: Change so that Tests.testUlpDiff() handles the NaNs and accepts a
>> ulp to
> Please consider this proposal to add some test coverage comparing `Math` and
> `StrictMath` results of `pow()`.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8211002: Change so that Tests.testUlpDiff() handles the Na
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:28:37 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: c0d4efff
Author: Brian Burkhalter
URL:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:21:52 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral
> data types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all
> four basic arithmetic operations.
Note: The `StrictMat
Please consider this proposal to add `divideExact()` methods for integral data
types to `java.lang.Math` thereby rounding out "exact" support to all four
basic arithmetic operations.
-
Commit messages:
- 8075806: divideExact is missing in java.lang.Math
Changes: https://git.openjd
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:26:23 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
> Random.AbstractSplittableGenerator is an internal class that should not be
> exposed in a public API.
Marked as reviewed by bpb (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/243
Please consider this proposal to add some test coverage comparing `Math` and
`StrictMath` results of `pow()`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8211002: test/jdk/java/lang/Math/PowTests.java skips testing for
non-corner-case values
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4758/files
Web
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared
to the pr
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
6506405: Clean up test
-
Changes:
- all:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 22:02:14 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
>> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show
>> differences compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
> src/jav
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
6506405: More test cleanup
-
Changes:
- all:
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared
to the pr
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:54:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 6506405: Add some tests
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/Math/AbsTests.java line 35:
>
>&g
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:00:24 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Modify the specification of
> `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream#read(byte[],int,int)` to indicate that `-1` is
> returned instead of `0` when the stream is at its end and the third
> parameter, `len`, is zero.
This pull req
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
6506405: Add some tests
-
Changes:
- all:
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
6506405: Set MAG_BIT_MASKs to bit-wise compleme
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared
to the pr
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 01:05:16 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
>> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit si
On Jul 7, 2021, at 5:50 PM, Joe Darcy
mailto:joe.da...@oracle.com>> wrote:
There is no specific constant in `{Float,Double}Consts` to mask all but the
sign bit, but I had thought it might be good to add one there
The sign bit mask can be bit-wise complemented though :-)
I had it that way in
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
6506405: Add comments, use new consts for m
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 00:38:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
>> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Math.java line 1530:
>
>> 1528: @IntrinsicCandidate
>> 1529: public static float
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 19:36:01 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I am happy with it as is, but I'll hold off
>> integrating it for now and rethink it later.
>
> Ok, good to know. Have a great weekend!
I am inclined to leave the wording alone barring serious objections to the
cont
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:28:37 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
On Jul 7, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Rémi Forax ***@***.**@***.***>> wrote:
Your patch change the semantics, actua
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:28:37 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
Good catch. Well that’s not good. If it needs to catch a special case it’s
probably not worth doing. given the
Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
`java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
-
Commit messages:
- 6506405: Math.abs(float) is slow
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4711/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=4711&r
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:28:37 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this change to make the `float` and `double` versions of
> `java.lang.Math.abs()` branch-free.
With this change there is no measurable effect on performance on macOS, but on
Linux there is approximatel
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 19:05:14 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java continues to fail intermittently
> with unexpected output from the VM.
> It appears that destroying the process causes a vm thread to fail to be
> started.
> Extend the delay between starting the
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:43:36 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Both conditions of the statement are intended to be met. If the stream is at
>> its end then
>>
>> if (pos >= count) {
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> will cause `-1` to be returned because at end of stream the condition
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 23:46:00 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to remove the fast path in
> `java.lang.Math.multiplyHigh()` the small performance improvement of which is
> eclipsed by the branch penalty.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:13:06 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to add a method
> `unsignedMultiplyHigh(long,long)` to each of `java.lang.Math` and
> `java.lang.StrictMath`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: ca4bea46
Author: Brian B
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 17:27:34 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 6766844: Correct error messages in test
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Byte
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 16:50:11 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 6766844: Correct error messages in test
>
> test/jdk/java/io/ByteArrayInputStream/ReadA
> Modify the specification of
> `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream#read(byte[],int,int)` to indicate that `-1` is
> returned instead of `0` when the stream is at its end and the third
> parameter, `len`, is zero.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with on
> Please consider this proposal to add a method
> `unsignedMultiplyHigh(long,long)` to each of `java.lang.Math` and
> `java.lang.StrictMath`.
Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremental views will show di
> Please consider this proposal to add a method
> `unsignedMultiplyHigh(long,long)` to each of `java.lang.Math` and
> `java.lang.StrictMath`.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8188044: Use multiply
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 23:46:00 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to remove the fast path in
> `java.lang.Math.multiplyHigh()` the small performance improvement of which is
> eclipsed by the branch penalty.
Please refer to the issue for a benchmark and samp
Please consider this proposal to remove the fast path in
`java.lang.Math.multiplyHigh()` the small performance improvement of which is
eclipsed by the branch penalty.
-
Commit messages:
- 8188046: java.lang.Math.mutliplyHigh does not run in constant time
Changes: https://git.openj
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 18:08:22 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Please consider this proposal to add a method
>> `unsignedMultiplyHigh(long,long)` to each of `java.lang.Math` and
>> `java.lang.StrictMath`.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementall
> Please consider this proposal to add a method
> `unsignedMultiplyHigh(long,long)` to each of `java.lang.Math` and
> `java.lang.StrictMath`.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8188044: Add @see link
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:13:06 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Please consider this proposal to add a method
> `unsignedMultiplyHigh(long,long)` to each of `java.lang.Math` and
> `java.lang.StrictMath`.
This PR does not address intrinsics for the proposed method; that aspect can be
Please consider this proposal to add a method `unsignedMultiplyHigh(long,long)`
to each of `java.lang.Math` and `java.lang.StrictMath`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8188044: We need Math.unsignedMultiplyHigh
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4644/files
Webrev: https://webrevs
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:04:48 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Modify `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream` methods `read(byte[])` and
> `read(byte[],int,int)` to return zero per the `InputStream` specification
> when the byte array actual or specified length is zero.
This pull request has be
Modify the specification of `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream#read(byte[],int,int)`
to indicate that `-1` is returned instead of `0` when the stream is at its end
and the third parameter, `len`, is zero.
-
Commit messages:
- 6766844: ByteArrayInputStream#read with a byte array of lengt
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:00:24 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Modify the specification of
> `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream#read(byte[],int,int)` to indicate that `-1` is
> returned instead of `0` when the stream is at its end and the third
> parameter, `len`, is zero.
This PR s
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:48:37 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Modify `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream` methods `read(byte[])` and
>> `read(byte[],int,int)` to return zero per the `InputStream` specification
>> when the byte array actual or specified length is zero.
>
> Bria
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:48:37 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Modify `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream` methods `read(byte[])` and
>> `read(byte[],int,int)` to return zero per the `InputStream` specification
>> when the byte array actual or specified length is zero.
>
> Bria
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:37:34 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Please review this small doc change to the system property. Accompanying CSR
>> has also been created.
>
> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Refined wording.
> Modify `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream` methods `read(byte[])` and
> `read(byte[],int,int)` to return zero per the `InputStream` specification
> when the byte array actual or specified length is zero.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
comm
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:49:16 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
>> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show
>> differences compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
> src/java
> Modify `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream` methods `read(byte[])` and
> `read(byte[],int,int)` to return zero per the `InputStream` specification
> when the byte array actual or specified length is zero.
Brian Burkhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
com
> Modify `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream` methods `read(byte[])` and
> `read(byte[],int,int)` to return zero per the `InputStream` specification
> when the byte array actual or specified length is zero.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
com
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:06:25 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Augment the specification of
> `java.io.File.createTempFile(String,String,File)` to clarify its behavior
> with respect to the `File` parameter `directory`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 68ef21
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:01:27 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Merge identical Unix and Windows versions of FileOutputStream_md.c into
> single, common FileOutputStream.c.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 3fae4b37
Author: Brian Burkhalter
URL:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:49:37 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 6766844: Add bug ID to test
>
> The spec for ByteArrayInputStream.read(byte[]
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:39:21 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Modify `java.io.ByteArrayInputStream` methods `read(byte[])` and
>> `read(byte[],int,int)` to return zero per the `InputStream` specification
>> when the byte array actual or specified length is zero.
>
> Bria
201 - 300 of 1816 matches
Mail list logo
