On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:18:39PM +0100, Michael McMahon wrote:
Documenting in release notes is okay too, but I suspect developers are not
likely to look there at first anyway. Thinking aloud, it would be nice if
some kind of annotation could be associated with the affected constructors
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 02:18:01PM -0700, Stuart Marks wrote:
This isn't definitive, of course, but it does seem to supply some
evidence that making this change would result in a relatively minor
source incompatibility.
Good, maybe it will allow a true fix to be made in this case.
Matthew.
