Re: Review/comment needed for the new public java.util.Base64 class

2012-10-18 Thread Michael Schierl
Am 18.10.2012 04:10, schrieb Xueming Shen: Hi Webrev has been updated with following changes (1) added a pair of en/decode(ByteBuffer src, ByteBuffer dst) methods I think line 443 needs an additional check for atom == 0. Same for the array case. At least if you do not want an endOfInput

Re: Review/comment needed for the new public java.util.Base64 class

2012-10-12 Thread Michael Schierl
Hello, (sorry if the threading is broken, but I was not subscribed to the list and only found the discussion on Twitter and read it in the mailing list archive) Ariel Weisberg wrote on Thu Oct 11 11:30:56 PDT 2012: I know that ByteBuffers are pain, but I did notice that you can't specify a