John, how about multi-language java.lang.Class or java.lang.reflect.Field?
S.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 19:12, John Rose wrote:
> Thanks, Ben; well said. Putting a multi-language JVM feature under
> java.lang would be the wrong signal. OTOH, if we ever do a type
> "Dynamic" in the Java language
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 15:40, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Le 04/10/2009 11:39, Christian Thalinger a écrit :
>> On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 23:43 -0500, Paul Benedict wrote:
>>
>>> I've always found it a bit perplexing that java.lang was never chosen
>>> for the parent package of the Dynamic API. Why is that? D
