On 08/09/16 17:08, Krystal Mok wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. It's good to know at least the known use cases
> from IBM have indeed been discussed.
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com
> <mailto:t.p.elli...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
&g
On 07/09/16 23:45, Krystal Mok wrote:
> I see that on the JBS page, your most recent comment says it's been decided
> that for JDK9 it's okay to deprecate and forRemoval=true, while also
> mentioning the uses of this class in IBM's implementation.
>
> Does that mean IBM has agreed on the
On 06/09/16 19:04, Xueming Shen wrote:
> On 9/6/16, 10:09 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Has it been noted that while JEP 254 reduces the space occupied by one
>> byte per character strings, moving from a char[] to byte[]
>> representation universally means that the maximum lengt
Hi Sherman, ok so I'll admit to reading through to the end of your note
and finding it interesting ;-)
Some comments in-lined.
On 03/Jun/2011 22:55, Xueming Shen wrote:
I'm sure everybody understands what negated character classes [^...]
in j.u.regex means.
You would never have doubt about
