On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:04:52 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>> Implementation of [JDK-8275062: "Allow jpackage create installers for
>> services"](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8275062)
>> CSR
>
> Alexey Semenyuk has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 08:10:27 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Seems like a missing include. C++ docs say `offsetof` is from ``,
> adding that include explicitly fixes the build. Seems to only happen with
> older GCCs, but it seems to be a happy accident it works on newer ones,
> probably through
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 04:07:18 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8276084: Linux DEB Bundler: release number in outputted .deb file should be
> optional
@andyherrick please review
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6345
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 19:58:01 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> The fix is to isolate C++ calls in the separate forked child process on
> Linux.
> This change requires the passing of JLI command line arguments and values of
> environment variables between two processes.
@andyherrick please review
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 04:07:18 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8276084: Linux DEB Bundler: release number in outputted .deb file should be
> optional
@sashamatveev please review
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6345
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 00:03:55 GMT, Alexander Matveev wrote:
>> Disable stripping to prevent rpmbuild from modifying executables
>
> Marked as reviewed by almatvee (Reviewer).
@sashamatveev @herrick please review
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/207
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:59:43 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
> Looks like another "Resource busy" issue similar to recent fixes for "hdiutil
> convert" and "hdiutil detach". Workaround in same way by repeating "create"
> command. Modified RetryExecutor to pass write to file flag, otherwise
> "h
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:40:38 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>> Looks good, although i see the following wasn't backed out:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> src/jdk.jpackage/macosx/classes/jdk/jpackage/internal/resources/JavaApp.icns
>>> ```
>>
>> yes - look again - it was renamed back to java.icns (the 12'th or 2
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:42:22 GMT, Victor Dyakov wrote:
>> As long as there are no transient build/test failures, it will be fine. I
>> was just comparing the results with what `git revert
>> 11c8c78c47f21fcd87a5969a859b5c4fced5e47d` generated and noticed this
>> diffe
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:52:44 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by almatvee (Committer).
>
> Since you are removing the problem listing, would it be better to use the
> parent bug ID -- 8263474 -- rather than a sub-task? How do you plan to
> resolve the parent bug? Manually as "D
10 matches
Mail list logo