treff:* Re: (XS) java.logging Level.java minor cleanups
Hi Bernd,
Good finding! I agree with the proposed cleanup.
I am always a bit uneasy of touching these classes
as they have a propensity to come back and bite you
from behind when you're not looking ;-)
I have applied your patch and sent
Hi Bernd, Mandy,
Sorry I missed answering your question!
On 23/08/2018 21:02, mandy chung wrote:
On 8/23/18 2:49 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Did you had any opinion on the synthetic accessors as well?
:
BTW: I get a synthetic Accessor warning on l.name/value, is this
what nestmates will
nkunft.net>; Daniel Fuchs
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Betreff: *Re: (XS) java.logging Level.java minor cleanups
On 8/23/18 2:49 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> Did you had any op
: Bernd Eckenfels; Daniel Fuchs
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: (XS) java.logging Level.java minor cleanups
On 8/23/18 2:49 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> Did you had any opinion on the synthetic accessors as well?
:
>> BTW: I get a synthetic Accessor warning on l.na
On 8/23/18 2:49 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Did you had any opinion on the synthetic accessors as well?
:
BTW: I get a synthetic Accessor warning on l.name/value, is this
what nestmates will resolve – is it worth adjusting the modifiers for>>
those fields anyway?
What warning message d
: Bernd Eckenfels; [email protected]
Betreff: Re: (XS) java.logging Level.java minor cleanups
Hi Bernd,
Good finding! I agree with the proposed cleanup.
I am always a bit uneasy of touching these classes
as they have a propensity to come back and bite you
from behind when you'r
Hi Bernd,
Good finding! I agree with the proposed cleanup.
I am always a bit uneasy of touching these classes
as they have a propensity to come back and bite you
from behind when you're not looking ;-)
I have applied your patch and sent it to our test system
for more confidence and everything we
Hello,
while investigating a Memory leak fix from IBM (IJ05380 is in 8.0.5.20 but not
in 8u yet) I noticed that the (fixed) code registerWithClassLoader(Level) in
the master queries a unused class name (pn) and it can use the method reference
instead of Lambda. See patch below.
There seems to
