On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Laurent Bourgès
wrote:
> Dear Java2D members,
>
> Could someone review the following webrev concerning Java2D Pisces to
> enhance its performance and reduce its memory footprint (RendererContext
> stored in thread local or concurrent queue):
> http://jmmc.fr/~bourge
>
> Also, this is with the Java version, right?
>
> Yes, my patch is pure java given as webrev:
> http://jmmc.fr/~bourgesl/share/java2d-pisces/webrev-1/
>
> We got a decent 2x speedup in FX by porting the version of Open Pisces that
> you started with to C code (all except on Linux w
> whereas on Windows / Mac it is client compiler (c1).
For Mac we only have a 64 bit VM which SFAIK should be c2 as well,
yet in that case native was presumably still faster. So its also a matter
of factoring in how good the code is that is generated by the C compiler.
-phil.
On 4/17/2013 1:26
Jim,
thanks for having some interest for my efforts !
As I got almost no feedback, I felt quite disappointed and was thinking
that improving pisces was not important ...
Here are ductus results and comparison (open office format):
http://jmmc.fr/~bourgesl/share/java2d-pisces/ductus_det.log
http:/
If I'm reading this correctly, your patch is faster even for a single
thread? That's great news.
One of the problems we've had with replacing Ductus is that it has been
faster in a single thread situation than the open source versions we've
created. One of its drawbacks is that it had been d
Jim, Andrea,
I updated MapBench to provide test statistics (avg, median, stddev, rms,
med + stddev, min, max) and CSV output (tab separator):
http://jmmc.fr/~bourgesl/share/java2d-pisces/MapBench/
Here are the results (OpenJDK8 Ref vs Patched):
http://jmmc.fr/~bourgesl/share/java2d-pisces/ref_de
Dear Java2D members,
Could someone review the following webrev concerning Java2D Pisces to
enhance its performance and reduce its memory footprint (RendererContext
stored in thread local or concurrent queue):
http://jmmc.fr/~bourgesl/share/java2d-pisces/webrev-1/
FYI I fixed file headers in this
