Apologies for overlooking the core-libs audience.
On 06/20/11 23:42, Joe Darcy wrote:
Vincent Ryan wrote:
On 06/20/11 16:08, Alan Bateman wrote:
Vincent Ryan wrote:
:
Thanks Alan. JNDI applications are encouraged to call close() rather
than
rely on GC to free resources.
I guess
Rémi Forax wrote:
Looks good.
By the way, why javax.naming.Context was not retrofitted
to implement AutoCloseable.
Thanks Rémi, thanks Vinnie.
I was wondering about Context too as it appears, on the surface anyway,
that it could extend AutoCloseable. I believe Joe used an annotation
Alan Bateman wrote:
Rémi Forax wrote:
Looks good.
By the way, why javax.naming.Context was not retrofitted
to implement AutoCloseable.
Thanks Rémi, thanks Vinnie.
I was wondering about Context too as it appears, on the surface
anyway, that it could extend AutoCloseable. I believe Joe used
I need a reviewer for a small fix to a test that I caught looping on my
system. The test creates a server thread that emulates a non responding
LDAP server. Unfortunately the thread goes into a loop reading from the
connection once it is closed. I'll bet the original author only tested
this
On 06/18/2011 09:39 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I need a reviewer for a small fix to a test that I caught looping on
my system. The test creates a server thread that emulates a non
responding LDAP server. Unfortunately the thread goes into a loop
reading from the connection once it is closed.
Your fix looks good.
On 18/06/2011 20:39, Alan Bateman wrote:
I need a reviewer for a small fix to a test that I caught looping on my
syst.em. The test creates a server thread that emulates a non responding
LDAP server. Unfortunately the thread goes into a loop reading from the
connection once
