Re: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant

2016-03-08 Thread Paul Sandoz
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 00:24, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for the quick fix! I am not able to test this on the short term, but > I trust you that Lucene builds now. I built it successfully a few times from scratch (downloading half the internet :-) ). > I am a bit nervous,

Re: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant

2016-03-07 Thread joe darcy
...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Steve Drach Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 8:07 PM To: core-libs-dev ; paul Sandoz ; Alan Bateman ; Xueming Shen Subject: RFR: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant Hi, Please review the following changeset. We’d like to get this into build 109, which

Re: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant

2016-03-07 Thread Steve Drach
] On >> Behalf Of Steve Drach >> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 8:07 PM >> To: core-libs-dev ; paul Sandoz >> ; Alan Bateman ; >> Xueming Shen >> Subject: RFR: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant >> >> Hi, >> >> Please review

RE: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant

2016-03-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
v-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On > Behalf Of Steve Drach > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 8:07 PM > To: core-libs-dev ; paul Sandoz > ; Alan Bateman ; > Xueming Shen > Subject: RFR: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant > > Hi, > > Please review the following changese

Re: RFR: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant

2016-03-07 Thread Alan Bateman
On 07/03/2016 19:07, Steve Drach wrote: Hi, Please review the following changeset. We’d like to get this into build 109, which means by noon today. This is essentially a temporary fix, but it’s been tested and Lucene has been built against it. We will follow up with a more comprehensive

RFR: 8151339 Adding fragment to JAR URLs breaks ant

2016-03-07 Thread Steve Drach
Hi, Please review the following changeset. We’d like to get this into build 109, which means by noon today. This is essentially a temporary fix, but it’s been tested and Lucene has been built against it. We will follow up with a more comprehensive fix by build 110. webrev: http://cr.openjdk