Thanks for the review!
Brian
> On Aug 7, 2020, at 11:04 AM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Looks good. Thank you for the change.
Looks good. Thank you for the change.
Naoto
On 8/7/20 10:57 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Hi Naoto,
Good point. Here’s an updated version:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8249703/webrev.01/. The number of blocks is not
available via a dedicated API call and so has to be calculated.
Thanks,
Hi Naoto,
Good point. Here’s an updated version:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8249703/webrev.01/. The number of blocks is not
available via a dedicated API call and so has to be calculated.
Thanks,
Brian
> On Aug 7, 2020, at 9:58 AM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Looks fine, Brian.
>
Looks fine, Brian.
I might add the condition if the block number is odd.
Naoto
On 8/7/20 8:33 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
On Jul 31, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Brian Burkhalter
wrote:
On macOS, the number of 1024 byte blocks appears to be incorrectly calculated
by 'df' using integer division by
> On Jul 31, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Brian Burkhalter
> wrote:
>
> On macOS, the number of 1024 byte blocks appears to be incorrectly calculated
> by 'df' using integer division by 2 of the number of 512 byte blocks,
> resulting in a size smaller than the actual value when the number of blocks
On macOS, the number of 1024 byte blocks appears to be incorrectly calculated
by 'df' using integer division by 2 of the number of 512 byte blocks, resulting
in a size smaller than the actual value when the number of blocks is odd.
Possibly instead of having the IS_MAC and IS_WIN constants it
