Hello,
I think the occurrence of the placeholder for process method in
AbstractProcessor is innocuous. It doesn't result an a javadoc entry
with the configuration options for the JDK doc build.
While looking at the class, I noticed some place where @Override could
be used:
https://gith
Hi there, I've seen that javax.annotation.processing.AbstractProcessor
overrides `Processor#process(..)` method without any changes to it [1]:
- it still is abstract
- signature is untouched
- javadoc is untouched
Is this done intentionally or this redundant override can be eliminated?
[1]:
https:
