I missed the mail about the fix given by Alan, please just ignore the
previous mail.
2011/2/18 Sean Chou
>
> Oh, I should have done a little more investigation.
>
> Is there a plan to fix it? I can provide a patch if it is needed.
>
> 2011/2/17 Alan Bateman
>
> Sean Chou wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
Oh, I should have done a little more investigation.
Is there a plan to fix it? I can provide a patch if it is needed.
2011/2/17 Alan Bateman
> Sean Chou wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I find there is a mismatch between the spec and the behavior of
>> java.io.FileOutputStream.getChannel().
>>
>> The spe
On 02/17/2011 10:34 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Sean Chou wrote:
Hi,
I find there is a mismatch between the spec and the behavior of
java.io.FileOutputStream.getChannel().
The spec reads: "The initial position of the returned channel will be
equal to the number of bytes written to the file so
Sean Chou wrote:
Hi,
I find there is a mismatch between the spec and the behavior of
java.io.FileOutputStream.getChannel().
The spec reads: "The initial position of the returned channel will be
equal to the number of bytes written to the file so far unless this
stream is in append mode, in
Hi,
I find there is a mismatch between the spec and the behavior of
java.io.FileOutputStream.getChannel().
The spec reads: "The initial position of the returned channel will be
equal to the number of bytes written to the file so far unless this
stream is in append mode, in which case it will
