Hi Jeremy,
I just proposed a patch on core-libs-dev.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 06/12/2017 01:17, Jeremy Manson wrote:
Hey folks,
Any thoughts on a timeline for this? We're just having to decide what to
do internally. If a patch is likely to arrive in the next month or so,
then we'll
mber 10, 2017 10:04 AM
To: Jason Mehrens; mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Change in properties for logging: deliberate?
Hi Jason,
I have done a few tests with JDK 8 & 7.
I have created custom handlers and added some
debug traces in their constructors and debug method
017 10:04 AM
To: Jason Mehrens; mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Change in properties for logging: deliberate?
Hi Jason,
I have done a few tests with JDK 8 & 7.
I have created custom handlers and added some
debug traces in their constructors and debug methods.
Then I h
to:daniel.fu...@oracle.com
<mailto:daniel.fu...@oracle.com>>>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
on behalf of
Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com
<mailto:daniel.fu...@oracle.com>>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re:
:)
>> Jason
>> ____________
>> From: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> on behalf of
>> Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
>> To: mandy chung
>> Cc: core-li
t should crash the internet. :)
Jason
From: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> on behalf of Daniel
Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Change in properties fo
ibs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> on behalf of
Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:29 PM
To: mandy chung
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Change in properties for logging: deliberate?
On 09/11/2017 19:16, mandy chung wrote:
> Daniel
On 09/11/2017 19:16, mandy chung wrote:
Daniel - we should add this known issue in the release note and document
the workaround.
Hi Mandy,
Right, it either need to be fixed, or documented in the release
notes. Let me first have a look at the issue though.
best regards,
-- daniel
Daniel - we should add this known issue in the release note and document
the workaround.
Mandy
On 11/9/17 9:48 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I'm afraid I don't have a timeline at this point, but I will
try having a look at the issue in the next couple of days.
best regards,
-- daniel
Hi Jeremy,
I'm afraid I don't have a timeline at this point, but I will
try having a look at the issue in the next couple of days.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 09/11/2017 17:42, Jeremy Manson wrote:
Thanks, Daniel. That is the issue. I probably should have described it
more clearly.
Do you
Thanks, Daniel. That is the issue. I probably should have described it
more clearly.
Do you have a sense of a fix timeline? If there is a relatively prompt
fix, I can backport it to our internal build instead of introducing churn
in our many, many logging configuration files. If it is likely
Sorry Jeremy,
I think I misread your issue.
The issue is that .handlers=X behaves differently than handlers=X
I'm afraid I might have introduced this regression with
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033661 :-(
The obvious workaround for now would be to use
handlers=
as documented in
Hi Jeremy,
Which jdk version/distribution are you using?
I see .level = INFO in the jdk9/master sources:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/file/tip/src/java.logging/share/conf/logging.properties
There should be no changes WRT the default level between 8 and 9.
best regards,
-- daniel
14 matches
Mail list logo
