On Feb 11, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> I have been following up on this issue. I am going to have to adapt the code
> a bit because there have been some changes in JDK8.
>
> I won't forget this issue though. It is possible I may not have time to
> backport it to Java 7.
>
Please l
I have been following up on this issue. I am going to have to adapt the code a
bit because there have been some changes in JDK8.
I won't forget this issue though. It is possible I may not have time to
backport it to Java 7.
Mile
On Feb 3 2013, at 21:26 , Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> On Feb 1
This looks fairly much complete to me. I will run it through the some testing
here and then push your patch.
Great work and thank you!
Mike
On Feb 3 2013, at 21:26 , Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
>>
>> I have created another issue 8007398 for t
On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
>
> I have created another issue 8007398 for the changes to Long. We can even
> test and push the two issues at the same time. Separating them into two
> changesets makes the intent easier to follow for future maintainers.
>
> We can use the sam
On Feb 1 2013, at 10:13 , Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
>
>> Good work Steven!
>
> Thanks for the review :)
>>
>> Some initial comments;
>>
>> - The changes to Long should be in a separate issue. It's generally
>> encouraged for changesets t
On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> Good work Steven!
Thanks for the review :)
>
> Some initial comments;
>
> - The changes to Long should be in a separate issue. It's generally
> encouraged for changesets to focus on only one change. Sorry, yes, it's
> additional overhead.
Good work Steven!
Some initial comments;
- The changes to Long should be in a separate issue. It's generally encouraged
for changesets to focus on only one change. Sorry, yes, it's additional
overhead.
- I would like to see if performed of toString() can be improved further by
using String(c
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006627
I have created a patch that dramatically improves UUID to/from string
performance.
Please find below a webrev with my proposed changes.
Thanks in advance for any feedback on the contents.
I do not believe I have a committer lined up yet.
; review on this list, clearly stating the subject, and the CR. I had
> submitted CR for this change (8006627), it will be eventually available
> in public [2]. So, for reviews, you should use this subject line:
> "RFR (S) CR 8006627: Improving performance and reducing object
> alloca
), it will be eventually available
in public [2]. So, for reviews, you should use this subject line:
"RFR (S) CR 8006627: Improving performance and reducing object
allocations of java.util.UUID to/from string"
c) Work with sponsors to commit this.
Thanks,
-Aleksey.
[1] "ksh mak
On 01/20/2013 04:54 AM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>> a) Do you need the masks before or-ing with most/leastSigBits?
>
> So, they seem to exist to satisfy a few Apache Harmony test cases:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/java/branches/java6/classlib/modules/luni/src/test/api/common/or
Thank you for the feedback!
On Jan 10, 2013, at 4:50 AM, Aleksey Shipilev
wrote:
> On 01/09/2013 09:51 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>> Hello again,
>>
>> I sent this email a week ago and have received no replies. Is there
>> any step I have missed necessary to contribute to the JDK libraries?
I apologize for the lack of reply. I had missed this thread while on holiday.
As Aleksey suggests the first step is to complete the OCA/CLA.
Until that step is complete we won't be able to act upon this contribution in
any formal way. I encourage you to update the patch with any specific feedbac
On 01/09/2013 09:51 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I sent this email a week ago and have received no replies. Is there
> any step I have missed necessary to contribute to the JDK libraries?
I think the crucial part is OCA, as per:
http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
> I am ver
Hello again,
I sent this email a week ago and have received no replies. Is there any step I
have missed necessary to contribute to the JDK libraries?
I am very interested in making your lives easier, so please let me know if I am
in the wrong place or are otherwise misguided.
Thanks!
Steven
Hello core-libs-dev,
My company uses UUIDs throughout our software. We recently identified that the
java.util.UUID implementations of fromString and toString are horridly
inefficient.
An incomplete list of the inefficiencies:
* fromString uses a regular expression that is not even precompiled
16 matches
Mail list logo
