Hello,
I have recently started to explore the source code and am new to the open
source community. I observed that in String.class within java.lang , the
indexOf method, line 1715, uses the bruteforce approach when it comes to
string matching. This method is used by the contains(CharSequence) meth
Thank you all for the quick response.
I will perform some tests and get in touch again asap.
On Jun 17, 2013 10:45 PM, "David Chase" wrote:
> For sufficiently large strings, indexOf can also be profitably
> parallelized.
>
> David
>
> On 2013-06-17, at 2:14 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
> > You a
For sufficiently large strings, indexOf can also be profitably parallelized.
David
On 2013-06-17, at 2:14 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> You are not the first person to have this idea.
> It is unlikely that you will succeed in changing the algorithm, because the
> jit-optimized brute-force algori
Hi Anubhav,
On 16.06.2013, at 14:53, Anubhav Chaturvedi wrote:
> I would like to bring the required changes and needed your advice on this.
Welcome to OpenJDK!
Please read through OpenJDK contributors page for the process we follow:
http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
It would be great if y
On 16/06/2013 11:53, Anubhav Chaturvedi wrote:
Hello,
I have recently started to explore the source code and am new to the open
source community. I observed that in String.class within java.lang , the
indexOf method, line 1715, uses the bruteforce approach when it comes to
string matching. This
Hello,
I have recently started to explore the source code and am new to the open
source community. I observed that in String.class within java.lang , the
indexOf method, line 1715, uses the bruteforce approach when it comes to
string matching. This method is used by the contains(CharSequence) meth