JDK 8 Reviewers:
The proposed patch is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/6470700/
JTREG tests pass and JMH benchmarking shows a very slight performance
improvement versus the extant code.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 21, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
On Aug 21 2013, at 17:01 , David M.
On 22/08/2013 20:41, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
JDK 8 Reviewers:
The proposed patch is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/6470700/
JTREG tests pass and JMH benchmarking shows a very slight performance
improvement versus the extant code.
It looks okay to me although the downside of this
You are correct: it should be private - I'll fix that.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
It looks okay to me although the downside of this idiom is yet another class
(which I assume can private btw).
On 08/22/2013 08:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/08/2013 20:41, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
JDK 8 Reviewers:
The proposed patch is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/6470700/
JTREG tests pass and JMH benchmarking shows a very slight performance
improvement versus the extant code.
It looks