Hi Joe,
The changes look fine.
Best,
Lance
On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:18 AM, joe darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First some background, one of the JEPs targeted to JDK 9 is
>
>JEP 212: Resolve Lint and Doclint Warnings
>http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/212
>
> In the jdk repository, only the depreca
Greetings,
I was tempted to address this point my initial message, but since it has
been raised I will do so now.
Many of the warnings in the JDK have been there for years or even more
than a decade in some cases. Therefore, historically those of us who
have worked on the JDK apparently have
Hello,
I am not sure this is a good idea, while I can understand a policy of "no
(new) lint warnings" and also activities to remove them (based on the
asumption that every warning is a potential bug or code smell) I absolutely
think supressing all remaining warnings without working to resolve them
Hello,
First some background, one of the JEPs targeted to JDK 9 is
JEP 212: Resolve Lint and Doclint Warnings
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/212
In the jdk repository, only the deprecation category of lint warnings
remain. While resolving the other categories of warnings mostly involved
