Thank you Robert for your review !
May I get your help to sponsor this change?
Thanks,
Amy
On 3/31/15 1:47 PM, Robert Field wrote:
Looks good.
-Robert
On 03/30/15 20:44, Amy Lu wrote:
Not yet got review feedback, I updated the webrev to get more cleanup
included.
Updated webrev: http://cr
Looks good.
-Robert
On 03/30/15 20:44, Amy Lu wrote:
Not yet got review feedback, I updated the webrev to get more cleanup
included.
Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amlu/8075304/webrev.01/
For your reference:
For all tests proposed to be removed in this patch, here are the
diffe
Not yet got review feedback, I updated the webrev to get more cleanup
included.
Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amlu/8075304/webrev.01/
For your reference:
For all tests proposed to be removed in this patch, here are the
differences between the one exist in "jdk" repo and "langtool
Kindly reminder ...
On 3/17/15 3:05 PM, Amy Lu wrote:
This RFR proposes to remove the duplicate FDTest from “jdk” repo.
FDTest exists in both “jdk” and “langtools”:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/file/tip/test/jdk/lambda/FDTest.java
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/file/
This RFR proposes to remove the duplicate FDTest from “jdk” repo.
FDTest exists in both “jdk” and “langtools”:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/file/tip/test/jdk/lambda/FDTest.java
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/file/tip/test/tools/javac/lambdaShapes/org/openjdk/tests/javac/
