Re: JEP 198: Light-Weight JSON API

2014-10-01 Thread Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
Hi everyone. Is there any reason to not implement the JSR that already exist and that was born? https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=367 https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=353 Which especific cases what the OpenJDK need and this JSR don't care? Why just work together with these JSRs and each one has yo

Re: JEP 198: Light-Weight JSON API

2014-07-31 Thread Mario Torre
I never gave a +1 with more enthusiasm! :) Cheers, Mario Il 31/lug/2014 03:27 "Wang Weijun" ha scritto: > > On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:35, Remi Forax wrote: > > > > > On 07/25/2014 04:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198 > >> > >> - Mark > >

Re: JEP 198: Light-Weight JSON API

2014-07-30 Thread Wang Weijun
On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:35, Remi Forax wrote: > > On 07/25/2014 04:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198 >> >> - Mark > > Hi Mark, Hi Mike, > Implementing a json API was one of the use case I've used during the > development of the lambda

Re: JEP 198: Light-Weight JSON API

2014-07-30 Thread Remi Forax
On 07/25/2014 04:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198 - Mark Hi Mark, Hi Mike, Implementing a json API was one of the use case I've used during the development of the lambdas, so maybe you are interested by this gist https://gist.githu

JEP 198: Light-Weight JSON API

2014-07-25 Thread mark . reinhold
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198 - Mark