Hi everyone.
Is there any reason to not implement the JSR that already exist and that
was born?
https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=367
https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=353
Which especific cases what the OpenJDK need and this JSR don't care?
Why just work together with these JSRs and each one has yo
I never gave a +1 with more enthusiasm! :)
Cheers,
Mario
Il 31/lug/2014 03:27 "Wang Weijun" ha scritto:
>
> On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:35, Remi Forax wrote:
>
> >
> > On 07/25/2014 04:45 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198
> >>
> >> - Mark
> >
On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:35, Remi Forax wrote:
>
> On 07/25/2014 04:45 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198
>>
>> - Mark
>
> Hi Mark, Hi Mike,
> Implementing a json API was one of the use case I've used during the
> development of the lambda
On 07/25/2014 04:45 PM, [email protected] wrote:
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198
- Mark
Hi Mark, Hi Mike,
Implementing a json API was one of the use case I've used during the
development of the lambdas,
so maybe you are interested by this gist
https://gist.githu
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198
- Mark