On 2016-01-27 14:55, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
c) (XS) Build changes that force emitting the "legacy" inline
StringBuilder concat in a few cases (e.g. when pre-JDK 9 bytecode is
expected):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8085796/webrev.root.00/
In what context do we need pre-JDK 9 bytecod
Langtools changes look fine to me (as discussed on previous review thread).
Thanks!
Maurizio
On 27/01/16 13:55, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Hi again,
This is a formal pre-integration review thread for JEP 280 ("Indify
String Concatenation") integration:
http://openjdk.java.net/jep
JDK changes looks good!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 1/27/16 4:55 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Hi again,
This is a formal pre-integration review thread for JEP 280 ("Indify
String Concatenation") integration:
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/280
The JEP is Targeted, the CCC i
I think it quite reasonable to push everything to jdk9/dev.
Paul.
> On 27 Jan 2016, at 14:55, Aleksey Shipilev
> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> This is a formal pre-integration review thread for JEP 280 ("Indify
> String Concatenation") integration:
> http://
Hi again,
This is a formal pre-integration review thread for JEP 280 ("Indify
String Concatenation") integration:
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/280
The JEP is Targeted, the CCC is approved, the code reviews and
pre-integration checks are clean.
Code changes are happening simulta
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/280
- Mark
