On 14/01/2019 20:21, Scott Palmer wrote:
Aren’t you just saying that jlink works when you don’t use the stuff that broke?
Can you use jlink with JAXB or JAX-WS that does not rely on the .jmod files
from JDK 9 or 10?
Is there a way to use JAXB or JAX-WS on the module path like there was with JD
. Januar 2019 21:21
An: Bernd Eckenfels
Cc: core-libs-dev
Betreff: Re: Modular Applications - Regression
Aren’t you just saying that jlink works when you don’t use the stuff that broke?
Can you use jlink with JAXB or JAX-WS that does not rely on the .jmod files
from JDK 9 or 10?
Is there a way to
--
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
>
> Von: core-libs-dev im Auftrag von
> Scott Palmer
> Gesendet: Montag, Januar 14, 2019 8:16 PM
> An: Alan Bateman
> Cc: core-libs-dev
> Betreff: Re: Modular Applications - Regression
>
>
>
>> On
, 2019 8:16 PM
An: Alan Bateman
Cc: core-libs-dev
Betreff: Re: Modular Applications - Regression
> On Jan 14, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2019 15:03, Scott Palmer wrote:
>> :
>>
>> Does this not require ALL dependencies - down the entire dependency
> On Jan 14, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2019 15:03, Scott Palmer wrote:
>> :
>>
>> Does this not require ALL dependencies - down the entire dependency chain,
>> including every transitive dependency, to be 100% modular?
> Look for "automatic modules", this is how the
On 14/01/2019 15:03, Scott Palmer wrote:
:
Does this not require ALL dependencies - down the entire dependency chain,
including every transitive dependency, to be 100% modular?
Look for "automatic modules", this is how the module system facilitates
top-down migration where you can migrate to m
I'm very new to modular stuff but I've just experimented with my java6
application that I've been bringing to this century by trying to use jdk11.
During these rehearsal I've been using various versions of javapackager,
jpackager and jpackage. jpackager (from Java8) seems to build a .app that do
Hi,
I’ld like to confirm something, because I see suggestions to “build X as a
modular app” or “build as a modular jar” and I’m wondering if I’m missing
something. These options don’t seem to be practical for most applications.
Does this not require ALL dependencies - down the entire dependen
