- Original Message -
> Yes, you are good to go.
>
Thanks!
Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/35e024c6a62c
> Thanks!
> -Sherman
>
>
> On 8/14/2012 6:13 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 14/08/2012 13:36, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>> :
> >>>
- Original Message -
> On 14/08/2012 14:13, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > Can I take that as it's good to push? :-D
> No objection from me although if the default is changed to
> SYSTEM_ZLIB=true for Linux (and maybe Solaris) then it will require
> making sure that it builds everywhere without n
On 14/08/2012 14:13, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Can I take that as it's good to push? :-D
No objection from me although if the default is changed to
SYSTEM_ZLIB=true for Linux (and maybe Solaris) then it will require
making sure that it builds everywhere without needing other options.
-Alan.
Yes, you are good to go.
Thanks!
-Sherman
On 8/14/2012 6:13 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
On 14/08/2012 13:36, Andrew Hughes wrote:
:
Do you have a static libz.a installed (from zlib1g-dev) and all
dependent static libraries?
I think you're right about the static li
- Original Message -
> On 14/08/2012 13:36, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > :
> >
> > Do you have a static libz.a installed (from zlib1g-dev) and all
> > dependent static libraries?
> I think you're right about the static linking but this was just a
> quick
> test to see if SYSTEM_ZLIB=true worked
On 14/08/2012 13:36, Andrew Hughes wrote:
:
Do you have a static libz.a installed (from zlib1g-dev) and all dependent
static libraries?
I think you're right about the static linking but this was just a quick
test to see if SYSTEM_ZLIB=true worked with everything else as default.
pack200 has
- Original Message -
> On 10/08/2012 18:40, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hi Andrew
> >>
> >> Alan mentioned the other day that the build (with your latest
> >> patch,
> >> with zlib-dev) failed at pack200
> >> when he tried to turn it on on linux. Can your doub
On 10/08/2012 18:40, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi Andrew
Alan mentioned the other day that the build (with your latest patch,
with zlib-dev) failed at pack200
when he tried to turn it on on linux. Can your double check on your
system?
What kind of failure? All webrevs
- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew
>
> Alan mentioned the other day that the build (with your latest patch,
> with zlib-dev) failed at pack200
> when he tried to turn it on on linux. Can your double check on your
> system?
>
What kind of failure? All webrevs I've posted pass a complete bu
Hi Andrew
Alan mentioned the other day that the build (with your latest patch,
with zlib-dev) failed at pack200
when he tried to turn it on on linux. Can your double check on your system?
-Sherman
On 08/09/2012 06:31 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Just checking on the status of this.
Am I ok to
- Original Message -
> On 08/06/2012 11:26 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> I meant if we are going to put SYSTEM_ZLIB=true as default for
> >> linux
> >> as
> >> Alan suggested,
> >> we might need to update the build document as well to
Hi,
Please make sure that the jdk/test/tools/* tests are run and validated.
Both the java launcher and the pack200 tools are dependent on zlib
entry points for inflate/deflate and other things.
Kumar
- Original Message -
On 08/06/2012 11:26 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Me
- Original Message -
> On 08/06/2012 11:26 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> I meant if we are going to put SYSTEM_ZLIB=true as default for
> >> linux
> >> as
> >> Alan suggested,
> >> we might need to update the build document as well to in
On 08/06/2012 11:26 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi Andrew,
I meant if we are going to put SYSTEM_ZLIB=true as default for linux
as
Alan suggested,
we might need to update the build document as well to include
zlib-dev
as the "necessary"
package to build jdk on linux.
- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I meant if we are going to put SYSTEM_ZLIB=true as default for linux
> as
> Alan suggested,
> we might need to update the build document as well to include
> zlib-dev
> as the "necessary"
> package to build jdk on linux.
Ok. I think that's a separate
Hi Andrew,
I meant if we are going to put SYSTEM_ZLIB=true as default for linux as
Alan suggested,
we might need to update the build document as well to include zlib-dev
as the "necessary"
package to build jdk on linux.
Currently the SYSTEM_ZLIB=true is set in make/common/Defs-macosx.gmk.
ZLI
- Original Message -
>
> On 8/5/2012 2:00 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > On 03/08/2012 19:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> :
> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/syslibs/zlib/webrev.02/
> >>
> >> is an updated version which checks if ZLIB_LIBS is set on Solaris,
> >> GNU/Linux
> >> and MacO
- Original Message -
> Andrew,
>
> I just pushed 7188852. Is it possible for you to update your webrev
> with
> this change? I would
> like to try a full build (and regression tests) on your final bits to
> make sure we don't break
> the build.
>
Do you mean the ZLIB_LIBS changes? I alr
- Original Message -
> Andrew,
>
> I just pushed 7188852. Is it possible for you to update your webrev
> with
> this change? I would
> like to try a full build (and regression tests) on your final bits to
> make sure we don't break
> the build.
>
Do you mean the ZLIB_LIBS changes? I alr
On 8/5/2012 2:00 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/08/2012 19:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/syslibs/zlib/webrev.02/
is an updated version which checks if ZLIB_LIBS is set on Solaris,
GNU/Linux
and MacOS X and sets it to -lz if not.
I wasn't sure what to do with W
On 03/08/2012 19:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/syslibs/zlib/webrev.02/
is an updated version which checks if ZLIB_LIBS is set on Solaris, GNU/Linux
and MacOS X and sets it to -lz if not.
I wasn't sure what to do with Windows but something can be added there if
n
Andrew,
I just pushed 7188852. Is it possible for you to update your webrev with
this change? I would
like to try a full build (and regression tests) on your final bits to
make sure we don't break
the build.
-Sherman
On 08/03/2012 11:33 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 03/08/2012 16:58, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> > : It's what we've had for years, and was added orthogonally to 8
> > in:
> >
> > changeset: 5118:d45bc4307996
> > user:michaelm
> > date:Tue Mar 06 20:34:38 20
- Original Message -
> On 03/08/2012 16:58, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> : It's what we've had for years, and was added orthogonally to 8 in:
>
> changeset: 5118:d45bc4307996
> user:michaelm
> date:Tue Mar 06 20:34:38 2012 +
> summary: 7113349: Initial changeset fo
On 03/08/2012 16:58, Andrew Hughes wrote:
:
It's what we've had for years, and was added orthogonally to 8 in:
changeset: 5118:d45bc4307996
user:michaelm
date:Tue Mar 06 20:34:38 2012 +
summary: 7113349: Initial changeset for Macosx port to jdk
though that version is b
- Original Message -
> On 02/08/2012 19:31, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > :
> >
> >
> > Ok, I thought that's what you were aiming at. That wouldn't solve
> > the problem
> > for us. We can't include a version of zlib in OpenJDK. It
> > violates distribution
> > policies and means security upd
On 02/08/2012 19:31, Andrew Hughes wrote:
:
Ok, I thought that's what you were aiming at. That wouldn't solve the problem
for us. We can't include a version of zlib in OpenJDK. It violates
distribution
policies and means security updates have to be applied in two places. We've
been
carryi
- Original Message -
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I do have a ref# for this enhancement #7110151. Though my original
> idea
> is to also have
> a configurable mechanism to switch the zlib usage during the jvm
> startup
> (-D option for
> example). Let's use this one for your patch. I will take a look
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2012 11:13 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> I do have a ref# for this enhancement #7110151. Though my original
> >> idea
> >> is to also have
> >> a configurable mechanism to switch the zlib usage during th
On 08/02/2012 11:13 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi Andrew,
I do have a ref# for this enhancement #7110151. Though my original
idea
is to also have
a configurable mechanism to switch the zlib usage during the jvm
startup
(-D option for
example). Let's use this one for y
Hi Andrew,
I do have a ref# for this enhancement #7110151. Though my original idea
is to also have
a configurable mechanism to switch the zlib usage during the jvm startup
(-D option for
example). Let's use this one for your patch. I will take a look your
patch this week.
-Sherman
On 08/02/
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
>
> In OpenJDK 8, some support has already been added for using the
> system installation of zlib
> (see the thread
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-July/010967.html),
> which is very similar to the support we've had in IcedTea for
32 matches
Mail list logo