14383: StringJoiner example in class description not in sync
with streams API
On 31/05/2013 12:26, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> :
>
> My understanding is the @author tag is no longer something we should
> be using for new JDK code (and to be egalitarian about it perhaps we
> should strip out @auth
On 31/05/2013 12:26, Paul Sandoz wrote:
:
My understanding is the @author tag is no longer something we should be using
for new JDK code (and to be egalitarian about it perhaps we should strip out
@author tags from all the code!)
I vaguely remember there was discussion on this topic a few year
On May 31, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 31/05/2013 11:49, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review this JavaDoc fix to j.u.StringJoiner to update and move the
>> examples to an api note.
>>
>> --
> This looks okay to me.
>
Thanks.
> The only thing is that removing @auth
On 31/05/2013 11:49, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Please review this JavaDoc fix to j.u.StringJoiner to update and move the
examples to an api note.
--
This looks okay to me.
The only thing is that removing @author can sometimes to a contentious
topic. Given that StringJoiner has been significant
