On 01/04/2012 09:54 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 04/01/2012 17:39, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi, Brandon.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpassani/6783209/1/webrev/
You're revised webrev looks good to me.
Looks good to me too.
Sherman - you sponsored Brandon's previous update to Formatter, are
On 04/01/2012 17:39, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi, Brandon.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpassani/6783209/1/webrev/
You're revised webrev looks good to me.
Looks good to me too.
Sherman - you sponsored Brandon's previous update to Formatter, are you
planning to do the same this time?
Hi, Brandon.
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpassani/6783209/1/webrev/
You're revised webrev looks good to me.
Thanks,
iris
Hi Iris. Answers below:
On 1/3/2012 1:27 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi, Brandon.
I am not a jdk8 Reviewer (http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8), but I am the
original author.
No time to check the spec now, but is precision ever applicable when the flag '%' is provided?
If it is, then old line 2
Hi, Brandon.
I am not a jdk8 Reviewer (http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8), but I am the
original author.
No time to check the spec now, but is precision ever applicable when the flag
'%' is provided? If it is, then old line 2726 should probably just be changed
to "print("%')".
Rather than
