Looks fine.
On 26/09/2018 14:07, Phil Race wrote:
Not 100% sure what happened there. I've re-uploaded it.
Shift-reload to avoid browser caching and look again.
-phil.
On 09/26/2018 01:51 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
On 21/09/2018 22:24, Philip Race wrote:
[*] at this exact moment, cr.
Not 100% sure what happened there. I've re-uploaded it.
Shift-reload to avoid browser caching and look again.
-phil.
On 09/26/2018 01:51 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
On 21/09/2018 22:24, Philip Race wrote:
[*] at this exact moment, cr.openjdk.java.net isn't working but
hopefully
that
Hi, Phil.
On 21/09/2018 22:24, Philip Race wrote:
[*] at this exact moment, cr.openjdk.java.net isn't working but hopefully
that will be fixed by the time anyone reads this :-)
The classExists() method still there in version .1
--
Best regards, Sergey.
thanks .. I guess you are deferring review of the rest of it to someone
from swing.
In that Swing area I have a minor update to the fix :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8211031.1 [*]
since I just realised (meaning just thought to check :-)), that the
private method
classExists() is called onl
Removal of module-info.java.extra is good.
Mandy
On 9/21/18 1:13 PM, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211031
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8211031/
Removing some obsolete code which is the reason for a qualified export
from java.base to java.desktop.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211031
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8211031/
Removing some obsolete code which is the reason for a qualified export
from java.base to java.desktop. I also cleaned up some commented out
debugging code.
See the bug evaluation for more det
