On 21/11/2013 04:04, Stuart Marks wrote:
OK, I'll remove the String.subSequence change from this changeset and
push it when I get approval.
I've filed this bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028757
to cover the CharSequence.subSequence issue and potential spec change.
It
On 11/15/13 8:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/11/2013 23:56, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 11/14/13 2:04 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Sorry for the delay (been enroute). Only issue I have remains the subSequence
change - you can't weaken the post-condition of CharSequence.subSequence without
breaking
On 14/11/2013 23:56, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 11/14/13 2:04 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Sorry for the delay (been enroute). Only issue I have remains the
subSequence
change - you can't weaken the post-condition of
CharSequence.subSequence without
breaking subtype substitutability.
Hi David,
On 11/14/13 2:04 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Sorry for the delay (been enroute). Only issue I have remains the subSequence
change - you can't weaken the post-condition of CharSequence.subSequence without
breaking subtype substitutability.
Hi David,
Yes, in general, what you say about weakening
Hi Stuart,
On 15/11/2013 9:56 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 11/14/13 2:04 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Sorry for the delay (been enroute). Only issue I have remains the
subSequence
change - you can't weaken the post-condition of
CharSequence.subSequence without
breaking subtype substitutability.
Hi Stuart,
Sorry for the delay (been enroute). Only issue I have remains the
subSequence change - you can't weaken the post-condition of
CharSequence.subSequence without breaking subtype substitutability.
Thanks,
David
On 12/11/2013 8:43 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Here's an updated
Hi all,
Here's an updated version of the String spec change. Changes from the previous
version address comments made by Brent Christian and David Holmes. Specifically:
- Specify copyValueOf() overloads as equivalent to corresponding valueOf()
overloads.
- Remove extranous changes to
The wording changes seem fine to me.
Thanks for the specdiff as it made it much easier to review
On Nov 12, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Here's an updated version of the String spec change. Changes from the
previous version address comments made by Brent Christian and