OK. One more time.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-logging-MemoryHandler
I compromised with the RuntimeException. I'm instead catching it, but
throwing a new one this way:
65 throw new RuntimeException(
66 Test Failed: did not load
On 10/25/2012 10:25 AM, Jim Gish wrote:
OK. One more time.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-logging-MemoryHandler
Great, thanks! I'll push it for you.
I compromised with the RuntimeException. I'm instead catching it, but
throwing a new one this way:
65
See updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-logging-MemoryHandler
Thanks,
Jim
On 10/17/2012 03:46 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 10/11/2012 2:37 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Please review the updated changes at
On 10/24/2012 12:31 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
See updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-logging-MemoryHandler
Looks good. Thanks for the update.
MemoryHandlerTest.java - thanks for renaming it but you forget to
change L28 @run tag. jtreg should fail if you run this
Fixed. Just needed to change a ul to /ul in StreamHandler.java
Jim
On 10/17/2012 02:46 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
I just discovered a small syntax error in StreamHandler (thanks to
specdiff :-)). I'll regenerate the webrev shortly.
Jim
On 10/17/2012 12:41 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Thanks. I believe
Here's an updated webrev that fixes some javadoc syntax issues:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-logging-MemoryHandler/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejgish/Bug7159567-set-logging-MemoryHandler/
Thanks,
Jim
On 10/11/2012 05:37 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Please review the updated
I've re-spun the change with additional usage notes in the spec to
reflect the long-standing actual behavior. Note that it doesn't change
the spec per se, as it was already stated in LogManager. This change
simply replicates that language with an example in each *Handler class
to make it
On 9/28/2012 12:13 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
I've re-spun the change with additional usage notes in the spec to
reflect the long-standing actual behavior. Note that it doesn't
change the spec per se, as it was already stated in LogManager. This
change simply replicates that language with an example
Sorry -- wrong list -- I mean to send to the openjdk list.
On 09/26/2012 05:19 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Please review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-MemoryHandler-target/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejgish/Bug7159567-set-MemoryHandler-target/
Overview - currently you can
Time to go home :-( I did send to the right list-- it's just that my
mailer didn't show the whole address. Yikes! Sorry about the spam.
Please review as originally requested.
On 09/26/2012 06:21 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Sorry -- wrong list -- I mean to send to the openjdk list.
On 09/26/2012
Please review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-MemoryHandler-target/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejgish/Bug7159567-set-MemoryHandler-target/
Overview - currently you can sub-class java.util.logging.MemoryHandler
and specify its configuration in a logging.properties file via
Hi Jim,
On 9/26/2012 2:19 PM, Jim Gish wrote:
Please review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug7159567-set-MemoryHandler-target/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejgish/Bug7159567-set-MemoryHandler-target/
Overview - currently you can sub-class java.util.logging.MemoryHandler
and specify
12 matches
Mail list logo
