On 06/11/2013 03:51, Mike Duigou wrote:
I have updated the webrev to backout the changes to how JT_HOME is set. This
will be addressed in the next set of changes (8020779
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8020779 and 8009683
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8009683) which will
Thank you for the review!
On Nov 6 2013, at 09:11 , Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 06/11/2013 03:51, Mike Duigou wrote:
I have updated the webrev to backout the changes to how JT_HOME is set. This
will be addressed in the next set of changes (8020779
One final set of changes was required based upon cross platform testing.
The revised webrev which passes cross platform testing on all platforms is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8015068/3/webrev/
The changes are:
- I had to switch to using uname -s because Solaris doesn't
Hi Mike,
Won't pretend I follow all the changes, but how did you get rid of the
platform-specific checks in the ProblemList ? Will jtreg figure that
part out for itself?
Also what is the failure mode if JT_HOME is not set and jtreg is not in
the path? Should we just fail in that case before
On Nov 5 2013, at 17:20 , David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
Won't pretend I follow all the changes, but how did you get rid of the
platform-specific checks in the ProblemList ? Will jtreg figure that part out
for itself?
Yes. JTReg has had this ability for a while and
I have updated the webrev to backout the changes to how JT_HOME is set. This
will be addressed in the next set of changes (8020779
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8020779 and 8009683
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8009683) which will revisit how
JT_HOME is set and how the
On 16/10/2013 21:22, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
With the imminent promotion of JTReg 4.1b07 it's possible to finally consider
completing this changeset!
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8015068/2/webrev/
This updated webrev includes handling of the shared library permissions.
Hello all;
With the imminent promotion of JTReg 4.1b07 it's possible to finally consider
completing this changeset!
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8015068/2/webrev/
This updated webrev includes handling of the shared library permissions.
Thanks,
Mike
On Aug 28 2013, at 04:11 , Alan
On 28/08/2013 00:17, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
I have updated the changeset for this issue based upon feedback from the
earlier version. As a result of intervening work this version contains even
more cleanup.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8015068/1/webrev/
Since the last
Hello all;
I have updated the changeset for this issue based upon feedback from the
earlier version. As a result of intervening work this version contains even
more cleanup.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8015068/1/webrev/
Since the last revision:
- One open issue remains--handling
Nice.
I think deleting code should be like hazard pay, double the normal hourly wage,
but deleting Makefile lines should be triple wage. :) Looks great to me. Not
that I use this makefile much anymore.
-kto
On Aug 27, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
I have updated the
On 08/08/2013 09:13 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
So we need a b07 of jtreg before we can proceed with this?
-Chris.
General question to all:
How much will fall over if we call it 4.2?
-- Jon
On 2013-08-08, at 9:22, Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com wrote:
On 08/08/2013 09:13 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
So we need a b07 of jtreg before we can proceed with this?
-Chris.
General question to all:
How much will fall over if we call it 4.2?
Some of the build scripts
Hello all;
This changesest simplifies how the the jdk/test/Makefile processes excluded
tests. Previously the test exclusions were pre-processed by scripts in the
Makefile before being passed to JTReg. JTReg will now the all the processing.
The change depends upon improvements in JTReg since
On 07/08/2013 14:44, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
This changesest simplifies how the the jdk/test/Makefile processes excluded
tests. Previously the test exclusions were pre-processed by scripts in the
Makefile before being passed to JTReg. JTReg will now the all the processing.
The change
On 2013-08-07, at 18:22, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 07/08/2013 14:44, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
This changesest simplifies how the the jdk/test/Makefile processes excluded
tests. Previously the test exclusions were pre-processed by scripts in the
Makefile
16 matches
Mail list logo
