Thanks Stuart for the good discussion. It reminds us that optional tags
may be not optional since we're writing Doc Comments that will become
part of the spec and affect overall look of it.
The issues you pointed out below may be true generally when writing p
tag in a html file. However,
Hi,
It is easier to read and maintain the source code if there is less
clutter and markup.
Previous consensus seemed to be to omit closing html when not required.
Roger
On 6/17/2014 12:33 AM, huizhe wang wrote:
On 6/16/2014 5:35 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
This is somewhat moot at this point,
This thread is a good reference on JDK 8's lint enforcement of HTML in
javadoc. You can see the reasons behind not allowing self-enclosing tags
and enforcing HTML:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-July/thread.html#19269
Cheers,
Paul
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:33 PM,
Hi Paul,
That thread, while interesting -- maybe :-) -- is about a somewhat different
issue: self-closing tags as opposed to optional end tags. Self-closing tags were
never part of HTML4 and thus are strictly illegal. In practice many people use
them and many browsers accept them, leading to
On 6/16/14 9:33 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
It's not xhmtl, but I would think closing tags is a good practice. Being
explicit is always a good thing to do.
Being explicit sounds good, but in this case it leads to errors; see below.
The problem with using the /p end tag is that it's easy for
This is somewhat moot at this point, but
I'd recommend against using paragraph end tags /p. Paragraph end tags really
are optional in HTML. I've heard some advocates of end tags, such as commenters
on the linked web page, say that end tags are somehow more correct (wrong) or
that end tags
On 6/16/2014 5:35 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
This is somewhat moot at this point, but
I'd recommend against using paragraph end tags /p. Paragraph end
tags really are optional in HTML. I've heard some advocates of end
tags, such as commenters on the linked web page, say that end tags are
Fix some typos in the JAXP documentation. Please review.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8046443/webrev/
Thanks,
Joe
Looks good to me Joe.
-Chris.
On 11/06/14 16:54, huizhe wang wrote:
Fix some typos in the JAXP documentation. Please review.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8046443/webrev/
Thanks,
Joe
Hi Joe,
Looks good!
-- daniel
On 6/11/14 5:54 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
Fix some typos in the JAXP documentation. Please review.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8046443/webrev/
Thanks,
Joe
Thanks Daniel, Chris!
-Joe
On 6/11/2014 9:11 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Joe,
Looks good!
-- daniel
On 6/11/14 5:54 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
Fix some typos in the JAXP documentation. Please review.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8046443/webrev/
Thanks,
Joe
Hi Joe,
please change
dont
to
don't
I would get rid of the p/p
otherwise it is OK
Best
Lance
On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:54 AM, huizhe wang huizhe.w...@oracle.com wrote:
Fix some typos in the JAXP documentation. Please review.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8046443/webrev/
On 6/11/2014 9:48 AM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Joe,
please change
dont
to
don't
Oops, I committed too quickly. But this is a dev comment, so we can fix
that in the next patch.
I would get rid of the p/p
Guide[1] for JavaDoc Tool suggests using p to separate paragraphs:
If you
Hi Joe,
/p is what I am talking about.
On the myriad of clean-ups that were needed to be done in JDBC, getting rid of
these type of pblah/p blocks was needed and just use p
Best
Lance
On Jun 11, 2014, at 1:20 PM, huizhe wang huizhe.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On 6/11/2014 9:48 AM, Lance
And, here is a good discussion on closing tags:
http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmltags/qt/optional-html-end-tags-when-to-include-them.htm
-Joe
On 6/11/2014 10:24 AM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Joe,
/p is what I am talking about.
On the myriad of clean-ups that were needed to be done in JDBC,
15 matches
Mail list logo
