Hi Micoslav,
What do you think about the webrev[1]? Does it make sense for upstream
maintainers?
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8047724/0/webrev/
Cheers,
Henry
On 06/30/2014 03:14 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 30/06/2014 02:30, Henry Jen wrote:
Ping.
Cheers,
Henry
Henry -
Hi Henry,
sorry for no response, I missed this one.
Yes, this looks reasonable. You can proceed with the change, I'll
integrate it into upstream projects.
Thanks
Miran
On 28/07/14 11:11, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi Micoslav,
What do you think about the webrev[1]? Does it make sense for upstream
On 30/06/2014 02:30, Henry Jen wrote:
Ping.
Cheers,
Henry
Henry - the code in the jaxws repository is maintained upstream. If you
change it in the jaxws repository then the changes will likely get
overridden at the next sync-up. I'd suggest working with Miroslav
(cc'ed) to get the changes
Ping.
Cheers,
Henry
On 06/20/2014 02:41 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
Please review a trivial webrev for jdk9/jaxws that do the same @since
tag normalization as in jdk9/jdk.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8047724/0/webrev/
I am not sure if there is another mailing list thatis more
Hi,
Please review a trivial webrev for jdk9/jaxws that do the same @since
tag normalization as in jdk9/jdk.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8047724/0/webrev/
I am not sure if there is another mailing list thatis more appropriate
for this, if so, please direct me to the right ml.
