Re: RFR: 8144062: Determine appropriate module for jdk.Version

2016-02-25 Thread Mandy Chung
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:59 PM, Iris Clark wrote: > > Hi, Alan, Mandy, and Mark. > > After exploring a few module options (jdk.Version, jdk.dev [0]), > it looks like the best choice is to move jdk.Version to > java.lang.Runtime.Version (a nested class of Runtime). It supports > the values re

Re: RFR: 8144062: Determine appropriate module for jdk.Version

2016-02-25 Thread Paul Sandoz
> On 25 Feb 2016, at 09:06, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 25/02/2016 05:59, Iris Clark wrote: >> Hi, Alan, Mandy, and Mark. >> >> After exploring a few module options (jdk.Version, jdk.dev [0]), >> it looks like the best choice is to move jdk.Version to >> java.lang.Runtime.Version (a nested class

Re: RFR: 8144062: Determine appropriate module for jdk.Version

2016-02-25 Thread Alan Bateman
On 25/02/2016 05:59, Iris Clark wrote: Hi, Alan, Mandy, and Mark. After exploring a few module options (jdk.Version, jdk.dev [0]), it looks like the best choice is to move jdk.Version to java.lang.Runtime.Version (a nested class of Runtime). It supports the values returned by the java.{vm.}?ver

RFR: 8144062: Determine appropriate module for jdk.Version

2016-02-24 Thread Iris Clark
Hi, Alan, Mandy, and Mark. After exploring a few module options (jdk.Version, jdk.dev [0]), it looks like the best choice is to move jdk.Version to java.lang.Runtime.Version (a nested class of Runtime). It supports the values returned by the java.{vm.}?version and java.{vm.}?specification.ver