On 17.03.2016 09:50, Claes Redestad wrote:
> please review this patch to remove lambda usage in the
> StringConcatFactory initializer, which saves some parts of
> java.lang.invoke infrastructure initialization for later.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152074
> Webrev:
Hi,
please review this patch to remove lambda usage in the
StringConcatFactory initializer, which saves some parts of
java.lang.invoke infrastructure initialization for later.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152074
Webrev:
> On 17 Mar 2016, at 07:10, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-17 08:05, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 17.03.2016 09:50, Claes Redestad wrote:
>>> please review this patch to remove lambda usage in the
>>> StringConcatFactory initializer, which saves some parts of
On 17.03.2016 10:10, Claes Redestad wrote:
> On 2016-03-17 08:05, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Is there any performance benefit in keeping the single PrivilegedBlock
>> though? I.e. convert the lambda to anonymous class, and be done with it?
>
> I haven't measured it thoroughly, but I've noticed
Thanks Rémi, Aleksey and Chris for reviewing,
since this might help with intermittent test timeouts in hs-nightly,
I've received
an offline request to push this via jdk9/hs-rt, which I'll do unless
anyone objects.
/Claes
On 2016-03-17 10:04, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 17 Mar 2016, at 07:10,
On 2016-03-17 08:05, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 17.03.2016 09:50, Claes Redestad wrote:
please review this patch to remove lambda usage in the
StringConcatFactory initializer, which saves some parts of
java.lang.invoke infrastructure initialization for later.
Bug:
-
> De: "Claes Redestad" <claes.redes...@oracle.com>
> À: "Aleksey Shipilev" <aleksey.shipi...@oracle.com>, "core-libs-dev Libs"
> <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Mars 2016 08:10:49
> Objet: Re: RFR: 81520