Thanks. I see the ERROR. I'm not sure of the reasoning why your fix
works: maybe because the data cell is empty, it doesn't need headers.
I'll do more experiments!
Anyway, I'm happy to go with the suggested fix.
-- Jon
On 07/10/2017 05:40 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
That looks great! Almost a
That looks great! Almost all "green"!
The only exception is the table in javax/xml/validation/Validator.java
where the empty cell resulted in a reported "ERROR". I tried changing
to and saw that the tool happily accepted it:
- 138 *
+ 138 *
If you decide to adopt the above
Here is the amended webrev for the work on fixing the tables (and other
nits) in the jaxp docs.
As we discussed, I changed the two manually edited tables, in
CatalogFeatures and XMLStreamWriter, to use scope=row/col. There are
now no tables in the jaxp repo using headers to identify row and c
Jon,
Glad to know that works out. Hopefully this exercise with the jaxp repo
can be a bit helpful to your effort and utility. Thanks for using the
jaxp repo for this exercise!
Best,
Joe
On 7/8/2017 9:58 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Joe,
Thanks for the feedback. I've done some experiments
Joe,
Thanks for the feedback. I've done some experiments and it looks like
we can indeed simplify the more complex tables to always use scope=row|col.
I'll post an amended webrev next week.
Thanks for the feedback and suggestion to revisit this issue.
-- Jon
On 7/7/17 5:50 PM, huizhe wang
On 7/7/17 5:50 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
Hi Jon,
For the table in CatalogFeatures, the id attribute for Type and Value
are not used, may be unnecessary. Instead, scope="col" can be added,
is that right?
50 * Type
51 * Value
I'm new to accessibility, but it seems to me the following can use
s
Hi Jon,
For the table in CatalogFeatures, the id attribute for Type and Value
are not used, may be unnecessary. Instead, scope="col" can be added, is
that right?
50 * Type
51 * Value
I'm new to accessibility, but it seems to me the following can use
scope="colgroup" instead?
46 * Value [
Sorry, I meant to include that; will post shortly, beside the webrev.
-- Jon
On 07/07/2017 01:33 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Jon,
The changes looked good to me. Is the html available by chance to do
an extra sanity check?
Best
Lance
On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
mailto:jo
Hi Jon,
The changes looked good to me. Is the html available by chance to do an extra
sanity check?
Best
Lance
> On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
> wrote:
>
> Please review the following fixes to the doc comments in the jaxp repo.
>
> The primary goal is to fix user-written tab
Please review the following fixes to the doc comments in the jaxp repo.
The primary goal is to fix user-written tables in doc comments for
accessibility, either by updating tables to use scope=row|col in header
cells for simple tables, or by using the headings attribute in more
complex tables.
10 matches
Mail list logo
