On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:15:18 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> I would leave it as an `@implNote` - or possibly `@implSpec`: depending on
>> whether or not we want all implementations of the spec to behave in this
>> way. However I don't think we would want to prevent subclasses from
>> overriding
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:56:28 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hello Daniel, you are right - I missed discussing whether or not to include
>> a `@implNote` to explain the natural sorted order of the property keys. When
>> we started this whole PR proposal, Alan had hinted that maybe we should
>>
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:43:25 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> unused imports
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Properties.java line 828:
>
>> 826: * a comment
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:59:56 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Properties.java line 836:
>>
>>> 834: *
>>> 835: * Then every entry in this {@code Properties} table is
>>> 836: * written out, one per line. For each entry the key string is
>>
>>
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:30:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
>> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>>
>> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:47:34 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> unused imports
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Properties.java line 836:
>
>> 834: *
>> 835: *
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:30:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
>> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>>
>> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:30:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
>> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>>
>> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in
> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>
> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in `Properties` have been modified to
> now look for the
