On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:55:30 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
>> This creates a regression test for
>> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
>> once blocked
>> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:55:30 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
>> This creates a regression test for
>> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
>> once blocked
>> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:55:30 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
>> This creates a regression test for
>> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
>> once blocked
>> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>>
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 09:26:08 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I think this looks okay. Can you say how long the test runs for you? It
> creates 130 JMOD files and I'm just wondering if the default timeout is
> enough when running with debug builds.
The following is the test result on linux x86 with
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:55:30 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
>> This creates a regression test for
>> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
>> once blocked
>> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>>
> This creates a regression test for
> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
> once blocked
> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
> ](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8276766)
>
> We found the issue can be produced stably
