On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:06:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review and a sponsor for a fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242882?
>
> As noted in that JBS issue, if the size of the Manifest entry in the jar
> happens to be very large (such that it exceeds
> the
Hello Brent,
Thank you for sponsoring this change.
In the meantime, I triggered the pre-submit GitHub action job to run the
"tier1" tests for a duplicate branch of this PR. That completed
successfully https://github.com/jaikiran/jdk/actions/runs/269960940.
I'll wait for the reviews, before initi
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:12:58 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review and a sponsor for a fix for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242882?
>>
>> As noted in that JBS issue, if the size of the Manifest entry in the jar
>> happens to be very large (such that it exceeds
>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:06:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review and a sponsor for a fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242882?
>
> As noted in that JBS issue, if the size of the Manifest entry in the jar
> happens to be very large (such that it exceeds
> the
Can I please get a review and a sponsor for a fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242882?
As noted in that JBS issue, if the size of the Manifest entry in the jar
happens to be very large (such that it exceeds
the `Integer.MAX_VALUE`), then the current code in `JarFile#getBytes` ca
