> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
> matching for instanceof.
>
> A summary of changes:
> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current specification
> proposal)
> -producing a compile-time error for
> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
> matching for instanceof.
>
> A summary of changes:
> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current specification
> proposal)
> -producing a compile-time error for
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:14:42 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
>> matching for instanceof.
>>
>> A summary of changes:
>> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
>> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current speci
> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
> matching for instanceof.
>
> A summary of changes:
> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current specification
> proposal)
> -producing a compile-time error for
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:13:34 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15 additional
>> commits s
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:12:08 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15 additional
>> commits s
> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
> matching for instanceof.
>
> A summary of changes:
> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current specification
> proposal)
> -producing a compile-time error for
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:26:57 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> I believe plain jtreg invocations may not be always setting "-g". So
>> probably better to be explicitly clear we need -g, as the test itself
>> requires the debugging info/LocalVariableTable?
>
> sure I understand that the `-g` option
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:11:28 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15 additional
>> commits s
> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
> matching for instanceof.
>
> A summary of changes:
> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current specification
> proposal)
> -producing a compile-time error for
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:36:41 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> test/langtools/tools/javac/patterns/LocalVariableTable.java line 29:
>>
>>> 27: * @summary Ensure the LV table entries are generated for bindings
>>> 28: * @modules jdk.jdeps/com.sun.tools.classfile
>>> 29: * @compile -g LocalVariableTabl
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:03:39 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
>> matching for instanceof.
>>
>> A summary of changes:
>> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
>> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current speci
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:03:39 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
>> matching for instanceof.
>>
>> A summary of changes:
>> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
>> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current speci
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 03:09:27 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
>> matching for instanceof.
>>
>> A summary of changes:
>> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
>> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current s
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 03:02:03 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
>> matching for instanceof.
>>
>> A summary of changes:
>> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
>> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current s
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:49:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> This is the current proposed patch for the upcoming JEP 394, for pattern
> matching for instanceof.
>
> A summary of changes:
> -making the feature permanent (non-preview)
> -making the binding variables non-final (as per current specificatio
16 matches
Mail list logo
